Results for “test-quality-review”

Analyzes test suites to measure assertion diversity, detect shallow or trivial assertions, and identify tests that lack meaningful verification.

Use `analysis-agent` to map acceptance to validation, `task-agent` to add or run bounded tests, and `review-agent` to assess proof coverage. Skip work with no material change or already-fresh complete validation.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

Audits test code in any language using the academic testsmells.org 19-smell catalog, producing a severity-ranked report with specific locations and actionable fixes.

Uses two independent review agents to verify output quality, requiring both to pass before shipping.

Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.

Evaluate retrieval quality from the local RAG index

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.