Results for “trust-scoring”

Assigns behavioral trust grades (A–F) to MCP servers by running probes for prompt injection, permission overreach, data leaks, and adversarial-input handling, and publishes reproducible onchain attestations.

Capture confidence ratings before and after a learning attempt to identify overconfidence and underconfidence patterns. Use when a student wants to understand how well they actually know something versus how well they think they know it.

Use `analysis-agent` to analyze permissions, secrets, sensitive data, trust boundaries, and injection; `task-agent` to implement controls; and `review-agent` to assess evidence. Skip self-review and no-trust-impact work.

Tracks bidirectional confidence scores across five domains (TECH, OPS, JUDGMENT, COMMS, ORCH) for agents and users, with triggers, anti-patterns, and pool scoring per runtime.

Slow down interpretation from observation to action. Use when students or adults need to examine assumptions in conflict, dialogue, or inquiry.

Sets up and audits the Claude Code harness for a project: CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, subagents, settings.json permissions, hooks, verification loop. Commands: kickoff (scaffold new setup), check-playbook (score an existing one), scouting-report (last scorecard), adjust (fix bloat/misplaced instructions), drill (turn advisory prose into real hooks/permissions/CI), decline (record an accepted risk), gameplan (work order with acceptance criteria before building), watch-film (check a diff against that order for scope creep/weakened tests/false claims). Use for setting up Claude Code, or on: "Claude ignores my CLAUDE.md", "it's huge and still misses things", "it said done but ran nothing", "it changed files I didn't ask about", "it weakened a test to pass", "rule, skill, or hook?", "is my setup any good". Not for code quality (code-audit), test coverage (test-assessment), one-off prompt wording (genie-proof-prompts), new skill authoring (skill-creator), or compacting a conversation (handoff).

Validates the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS) metric by measuring its consistency with human judgment on word-level sentiment polarity, using the AmbGIMT dataset and pairwise score comparisons.