Results for “vendor-assessment”

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

Build a multi-factor asset criticality scoring model to weight vulnerability prioritization based on business impact, data sensitivity, and operational importance.

Use `analysis-agent` for release decisions, `task-agent` for delivery artifacts, or `review-agent` for readiness on deployment, migration, rollback, or production risk. Skip local work with no release decision.

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session.

Use `analysis-agent` to map acceptance to validation, `task-agent` to add or run bounded tests, and `review-agent` to assess proof coverage. Skip work with no material change or already-fresh complete validation.

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session. Use when the user runs /hub:eval or asks to score, compare, or pick a winner among completed AgentHub agents.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use when API, schema, event, or behavior changes need compatibility, deprecation, rollout, or migration; skip without version impact.

Two-stage review engine with four-layer quality model for the WinDAGs meta-DAG. Receives completed node outputs and produces ReviewResult containing QualityVector. Stage 1 (Haiku) checks Floor + Wall on every node. Stage 2 (Sonnet) runs Ceiling evaluation conditionally using economic escalation formula. Enforces BC-EVAL-001 through BC-EVAL-006. Activate when operating as the Evaluator role in the meta-DAG, when reviewing node outputs, when computing quality vectors, or when deciding Stage 2 escalation.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use for input authority, parsing, canonicalization, bounds, state checks, writable fields, rejection, or external-response changes.

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session. Use when the user runs /hub:eval or asks to score, compare, or pick a winner among completed AgentHub agents.

Evaluate and rank agent results by metric or LLM judge for an AgentHub session.

Agent validation overhaul: reward weight overrides, fitness decline gate, pinned data, staged experiments