Results for “vulnerability-assessment”

Build a multi-factor asset criticality scoring model to weight vulnerability prioritization based on business impact, data sensitivity, and operational importance.

Three-phase vulnerability chain analysis — parallel agents find individual weaknesses, then a synthesis step identifies which combinations escalate to critical impact. Inspired by Strix (usestrix/strix) "Graph of Agents" pentesting model.

OWASP Top 10 + Supabase-first hardening burndown. Use when "security audit plan", "OWASP audit", "hardening plan", or "security burndown". App-layer auth flows → audit-auth-flows. Table RLS → plan-rls-audit. Key rotation → plan-secrets-audit. App LLM attacks → audit-llm-security.

Test vector stores for embedding inversion, cross-tenant leakage, and poisoning.

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use for changed assets, trust boundaries, reachable abuse paths, impact, or control placement; skip without a security delta.

Designing red team attack scenarios, threat models, MITRE ATT&CK/OWASP application, Purple Team exercises, and AI/LLM red teaming. Use when adversarial security validation is needed.

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for