Results for “xyz-hypothesis”

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus and distributed coordination. Queen-led hierarchical swarm management with multiple consensus strategies. Use when: distributed coordination, fault-tolerant operations, multi-agent consensus, collective decision making. Skip when: single-agent tasks, simple operations, local-only work.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, testing, or diagnosing Python Bayesian models built directly with PyMC, including Model, coords/dims, Data, random variables, potentials, posterior sampling, prior/posterior predictive checks, and InferenceData output. Trigger on model geometry, shape errors, divergences, sampler choice, mutable prediction data, and probabilistic validation. Do not use for Bambi formula models, NumPyro/JAX programs, ArviZ-only analysis of existing draws, deterministic optimization, or general statistics without PyMC code.

Converts abstract edge concepts into concrete strategy draft variants with configurable risk profiles and optional exportable ticket YAMLs for downstream validation.

Accelerate LLM inference using speculative decoding, Medusa multiple heads, and lookahead decoding techniques for 1.5-3.6× speedup without quality loss.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, or testing Python analysis of Bayesian inference results with ArviZ, including 1.x DataTree groups, legacy InferenceData inputs, xarray dimensions and coordinates, conversion, summaries, R-hat/ESS/MCSE diagnostics, posterior predictive checks, PSIS-LOO, Pareto-k, and model comparison. Trigger on chain/draw shape errors, mislabeled groups, flattened samples, missing log likelihood, or misleading diagnostic claims. Do not use to construct or sample PyMC, NumPyro, or Bambi models, for generic plotting, or for deterministic statistics without Bayesian draws.

Guía para elegir y aplicar tests de hipótesis con SciPy, verificando supuestos, interpretando p-values y tamaño del efecto, y evitando falsos positivos.

Claim-driven 实验设计：界定目标 claims → 设计实验块（baseline/validation/ablation/robustness）→ 构建执行顺序 → 可选 Review LLM review → 写入 wiki