Packs

1 pack

@brycewang-stanford

Twelve-skill bundle covering the NEJM clinical manuscript lifecycle: workflow router, clinical-significance fit, study design & trial registration, EQUATOR reporting guidelines, structured abstract, terse IMRAD writing, clinical statistics, clinical display items, clinical ethics & integrity, Vancouver/ICMJE references, submission preflight, and response to reviewers.

7 skills · pack

Results for “review-report”

19 skills

Reviews code changes with a second AI reviewer, validates reported issues against the actual code, and reports only confirmed findings.

Reviews all uncommitted changes in the current Git repository and produces a structured code review report with findings and a verdict.

Produces a maintainer-grade review of a pull request or large contribution, explaining the change tutorial-style and delivering a polished HTML or Markdown report with a concrete merge recommendation.

Automates code review for pull requests across 14+ languages, analyzing complexity, risk, code quality, and generating structured review reports.

20.4k · bundle

Runs a deeper code review with the GLM-5 model via glm-review, validates findings against the actual code, and reports only confirmed issues.

differential-review

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs), adapting analysis depth to codebase size and generating comprehensive markdown reports.

More results

quality-playbook

Runs a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase, deriving behavioral requirements, generating spec-traced tests, performing multi-pass code review, and producing a consolidated bug report with verified patches.

36.2k · bundle

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, code smells, and architectural concerns, producing a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback.

10.4k · bundle

Reviews staged and unstaged code changes for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, reporting findings by severity.

Runs three parallel reviewers to find code reuse, quality, and efficiency issues in a diff, then applies safe fixes and reports risky ones.

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Routes quality reviews to specialized critic agents based on file type or flags, covering peer review, code review, and manuscript polish.

requesting-code-review

Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade, with precisely crafted context for evaluation.

Runs a structured bug-fix pipeline: scouts evidence, diagnoses root cause, applies minimal fixes, and reviews before committing.

lucaspmarie-a11y

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, producing a prioritized report with severity ratings and concrete fixes.

apple-appstore-reviewer

Audits iOS app source code and metadata to identify App Store rejection risks and optimization opportunities, producing a structured compliance report.

Audits code quality against a shared contract, producing structured findings and blocking pipeline phases on critical issues without modifying code.

test-anti-patterns

Audits test files for anti-patterns and quality issues, producing a severity-ranked report across multiple languages and frameworks.

Runs an evidence-first, read-only workflow over large codebases via an external JSONL REPL server, retrieving only minimal file slices and greps to produce cited architecture and audit reports.