Results for “safety-review”

Create, update, and comment on GitHub pull requests with a focus on material impact, safety, and human reviewability.

Scans codebases for security vulnerabilities by reasoning about code context, data flow, and component interactions, covering injection flaws, secrets exposure, authentication issues, and weak cryptography across multiple languages.

Review pull requests following Sentry engineering practices, covering security, performance, testing, and design.

Reviews and repairs risky or unclear code with minimal validated changes, running a fixed-point loop until the diff is clean across two consecutive review cycles.

Provides a structured code review checklist covering security, performance, correctness, maintainability, testing, accessibility, and documentation, with a three-pass review process and guidance on severity levels and anti-patterns.

Reviews staged and unstaged code changes for security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, reporting findings by severity.

Routes quality reviews to specialized critic agents based on file type or flags, covering peer review, code review, and manuscript polish.

Reviews a codebase for structural smells and refactors them with provable safety, using micro commits and green-bar discipline.

Provides production-grade TypeScript guidance for React and Next.js, covering type narrowing, component props, generics, runtime validation, data fetching, state management, performance, accessibility, and code review.