Results for “trigger”

Turn a cold start into a warm one. Build a single orientation document for a project, account, or workspace, what it is, where things live, the decisions made so far, the open items, and the next move, so a new session or a new teammate is productive in minutes instead of days. Trigger on "get me up to speed", "onboard someone to this", "what's the context here", "brief a new session", "orient me on this account", or any cold-start on work already in motion.

The pre-share gate for a Superhuman Docs (Coda) document. Before a doc reaches a reader, run the QA checklist, choose the interaction mode, set the publish frame, and confirm the share. Catches the broken formula, the wall of text, the orphaned bullet, the missing cover, the wrong audience. Trigger on "is this doc ready to share", "publish this doc", "QA this doc", "ship-check", "final pass before I send", "which interaction mode", or any moment a Superhuman Doc is about to leave the building.

Polish English academic papers for SSCI journal submission. This skill checks grammar, improves readability, and enhances academic tone. Use when the user asks to polish, proofread, edit, or improve their English academic paper, manuscript, or article — especially when targeting SSCI, SCI, or other international journals. Also use when the user asks to "润色", "修改语法", "提升学术性", "polish my paper", or mentions their paper needs language improvement for journal submission. Always trigger on any request involving academic English polishing, even if the user doesn't explicitly say "SSCI."

Inspects a skill's SKILL.md and its observations/runs.md log, identifies failure patterns, and proposes a targeted amendment to improve the skill. Trigger on: "improve this skill", "fix this skill", "update this skill", "why does X keep failing", "this skill is wrong", "add this to the skill", or automatically when observations/<skill-name>/runs.md contains 3 or more failure entries. Outputs the amendment as a diff the user can review before applying. Records the amendment rationale in observations/<skill-name>/runs.md after user confirmation.

Walk into the negotiation with a plan, not a hope. Sets your walk-away and your target, builds the concession ladder (what you trade and what you get for it), maps their likely asks, and drafts the responses that protect price and terms. Built for B2B sales teams, customizable to your CRM and your deal process. Trigger on "prep me for this negotiation", "the prospect wants a discount", "what should I concede", "build my concession ladder", "hold price on a new deal", or any pre-negotiation planning.

Apply one logical code change with mandatory impact mapping, git snapshot, verification, and automatic revert on failure. Load when the user asks for a safe edit, verified change, one change at a time with rollback, or codespine-style edit loop. Also triggers on "safe change", "edit with verification", "don't break the build", "revert if tests fail", or any non-trivial code edit where blast radius matters. Always runs dependency-mapping first. Pairs with incremental-implementation for multi-slice work; this skill is one atomic verify cycle per invocation.

Run a real win/loss debrief on a single deal, not a shrug. It reconstructs what actually moved the deal, what nearly killed it, and the one repeatable lesson, then captures it so the next deal is run better instead of relearned the hard way. Built for B2B sales teams, customizable to your CRM and your deal process. Trigger on "debrief this deal", "why did we win", "why did we lose", "win/loss on this one", "what should we learn from this deal", or any single-deal retrospective.

Close the gap between "you corrected me" and "it never happens again." Scan a work session for the corrections you made, the things you approved, and the patterns that held up, then propose specific edits to your skills, playbooks, and docs, high-confidence corrections separated from medium-confidence patterns, with nothing changed until you approve. Trigger on "learn from this session", "what should we update", "turn this into a rule", "close the loop", "improve the playbook", or the end of any session where you corrected or approved the work.

Build a proposal that closes, not a brochure. It opens with their problem in their words, scopes the solution to that problem, frames the price on the value it returns, states the terms plainly, and ends with one clear next step. Written to send, not to rewrite. Built for B2B sales teams, customizable to your CRM and your deal process. Trigger on "write a proposal", "build the SOW", "draft the quote", "turn this deal into a proposal", "make a proposal I can send", or any proposal or quote request.

Turn a new rep's start date into a ramp that ends in quota, not confusion. Builds a 30/60/90 onboarding plan with milestones at each gate, a certification bar they have to clear before they carry full load, and the manager touchpoints that catch a slow ramp early. Built for B2B sales managers and enablement, customizable to your role and motion. Trigger on "build an onboarding plan", "30/60/90 for a new AE", "how do I ramp this rep", "certification checklist", "onboarding milestones", or any new-hire ramp.

Bandpass, lowpass, bandstop filter design — hairpin, coupled-line, combline, stub, SIW for frequency selection and harmonic rejection. TRIGGER: user asks to design, create, or analyze any RF filter (bandpass, lowpass, highpass, bandstop, hairpin, coupled-line, combline, stub, SIW). Invoke BEFORE writing code — filter class names differ from what you would guess. SKIP: EM simulation/S-parameter extraction of an existing filter (use matlab-analyze-em), general PCB layout assembly (use matlab-assemble-pcb-layout), material/stackup setup only (use matlab-manage-pcb-material), optimization sweeps (use matlab-optimize-pcb-design).

Build lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from Getting Real, Rework, and Shape Up. Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat marker sketch", "build less", "underdo the competition", or "opinionated software". Also trigger when cutting scope to ship faster, running small teams, avoiding long-term roadmaps, or eliminating meetings. Covers shaping, betting, building, and the art of saying no. For MVP validation, see lean-startup. For design sprints, see design-sprint.

Turn "we should get press" into an earned-media plan a journalist might actually answer. The story angle worth their byline, a target list by beat, a pitch built for one reporter at a time, and a follow-up rhythm that is persistent without being a pest. Built for B2B teams doing their own PR, customizable to your story and your beats. Trigger on "help me pitch this", "build a PR plan", "which journalists cover this", "write a media pitch", "how do I follow up with press", or any earned-media outreach question.

Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainability reporting obligations, ESG disclosure, CSRD scope and thresholds, value chain reporting, XBRL digital tagging, third-party assurance, CSRD gap assessments, CSRD implementation timelines, ESRS E1–E5 environmental standards, ESRS S1–S4 social standards, ESRS G1 governance, CSRD vs GRI/TCFD/SASB alignment, or any EU corporate sustainability reporting question. Trigger even if the user only mentions "ESG reporting Europe", "sustainability disclosure EU", or "non-financial reporting".

Expert ITAR compliance advisor for US defense contractors, exporters, and manufacturers. Use this skill for any question about 22 CFR Parts 120-130, the United States Munitions List (USML), DDTC registration, export license applications (DSP-5/73/94), Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), Manufacturing License Agreements (MLA), brokering regulations (Part 129), deemed export rules for foreign nationals, technology control plans, voluntary disclosures, violation mitigation, jurisdiction determination (ITAR vs EAR), or US Munitions List category scoping. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ITAR or US defense export control question should use this skill.

Turn "which leads should I work?" into a lead-by-lead work plan. Per-lead status (never-touched, engaged-not-replied, gone-cold, hot), days-dark per lead, last-touch quality, a re-engagement ranker, and a recommended next action for every lead. Built for SDRs and full-cycle reps, customizable to your CRM and your outreach tool. Trigger on "which leads should I work?", "who haven't I touched?", "show me cold leads", "hot leads to follow up on", "who's gone dark?", "re-engagement candidates", or any lead-level work-assignment question.

E1-Quantitative Analysis Guide with Code Generation & Sensitivity Analysis VS-Enhanced with Full 5-Phase process: Avoids obvious analyses, explores innovative methodologies Expanded to include qualitative analysis (thematic, grounded theory, content, narrative) Absorbed E4 (Analysis Code Generator) and E5 (Sensitivity Analysis - Primary Study) capabilities Use when: selecting statistical/qualitative methods, interpreting results, checking assumptions, generating code, sensitivity analysis Triggers: statistical analysis, ANOVA, regression, t-test, power analysis, assumption checking, effect size, thematic analysis, grounded theory, content analysis, narrative analysis, NVivo, ATLAS.ti, coding, qualitative data, R code, Python code, SPSS syntax, sensitivity analysis, robustness check

Turn "what should we pay reps and what number do we give them" into a defensible comp and quota plan. Reconciles a top-down number against a bottom-up build, sets the OTE mix, lays out accelerators, and names the behaviors the plan will drive and the ones it will break. Built for B2B sales leaders, customizable to your motion and your segments. Trigger on "design the comp plan", "set quotas", "what OTE should I pay", "reconcile top-down and bottom-up", "what will this plan actually incentivize", or any comp or quota build.

This skill recommends obtaining a baseline BMD measurement by DXA in adolescents or women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) and concurrent polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who have six or more months of amenorrhea, and earlier if there is history or suspicion of severe nutritional deficiency, other energy deficit states, or skeletal fragility. Use when a clinician states, “She has PCOS and no periods for seven months—let’s get a DXA,” or similar triggers such as “Check BMD in PCOS+FHA after six months amenorrhea” or “Order DXA sooner due to low weight.”

Analyzes state merit review for non-covered securities offerings, applying NASAA Statements of Policy to cheap stock, promoter equity investment, voting rights, and promoter compensation. Produces examiner-ready comment responses with cap table analysis and negotiation strategy. Use when filing Reg A, Rule 504, intrastate, or direct public offerings in merit review states, responding to Blue Sky examiner comments, structuring offerings to avoid conditioning, or analyzing NASAA SOPs. Also trigger on cheap stock analysis, promoter equity tests, unequal voting rights review, state examiner correspondence, or phrases like "merit review issues" or "the state examiner sent comments."

Turn churned and downgraded accounts into an early-warning system. Reads the customers who left or shrank, extracts the themes behind why, builds a warning checklist from the real causes, then reads your active book and flags which accounts look like the ones that just churned. Built for B2B retention teams, customizable to your CRM and your customer data. Trigger on "why do customers churn", "what do churned accounts have in common", "build me a churn early-warning list", "which accounts are at risk of churning", "who looks like a recent churner", or any retention post-mortem.

Diagnose monogenic and syndromic obesity in children and adolescents using a structured step-by-step algorithm. Use this skill whenever a clinician suspects a genetic cause of obesity, asks about leptin deficiency, MC4R mutation, POMC deficiency, PCSK1 deficiency, leptin receptor deficiency, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Alström syndrome, or any case of early-onset severe obesity with hyperphagia. Also trigger for questions about targeted pharmacotherapy including setmelanotide or metreleptin, or when to order a genomic obesity panel. Cross-references the NHS Genomic Test Finder skill to surface the relevant R-code once a diagnosis is reached.

Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

Package and publish a skill to the skills.sh community registry, a public GitHub repo, or both. Load when the user asks to publish a skill, share a skill publicly, submit a skill to the registry, release a skill, or when universal-skill-creator offers publishing as a final step after creation. Also triggers on "push this skill to skills.sh", "make this skill public", "share this skill", or "contribute this skill to the community". Validates quality before publishing, packages correctly (zip for multi-file, .md for atomic), writes a README if missing, and publishes via npx skills CLI.

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

Turn "is this account a real fit?" into a stacked verdict. A composite 0-100 fit score built from every signal you have, a breakdown by source, override flags for when a scoring tool is wrong, a channel classification, and a written rationale. Built for reps, marketers, and RevOps, customizable to your CRM and whatever scoring you use. Trigger on "is {account} a real fit?", "score this list against our profile", "find lookalikes to our best customers", "why is the score wrong on {account}?", "validate this prospect list", "what's our coverage in {segment}?", or any account or list qualification.

Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

Simulator.Company chart and dashboard specialist. Use when the user wants to create, configure, or query charts (line, bar, area), dashboards, or financial time-series visualisations on a graph layer. Trigger on any of these intents: — Creating: "create chart", "add chart", "create dashboard", "add dashboard", "build visualisation", "chart на графе", "график с данными", "дашборд", "show metrics on graph", "visualise account data", "plot actor balances". — Configuring: "change chart type", "switch to bar chart", "update chart range", "use last day", "show turnover", "change time range", "filter chart actors". — Querying: "get chart data", "show dashboard", "what charts are on this layer", "fetch chart metrics", "dashboard data".

Decompose an unknown quantity into 3-5 estimable factors and produce a defensible order-of-magnitude answer without needing precise data. Load when the user needs to size something without data — market size, resource requirements, effort estimates, user numbers, costs — or when a decision is blocked by "we don't know the numbers". Also triggers on "ballpark this", "rough estimate", "how big is this market", "how long would this take", "how many users", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a sizing/estimation frame. The goal is not precision — it is a defensible answer that enables a decision to be made. Based on Enrico Fermi's estimation method.

Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

Turn a rough idea into a fully approved design before any code is written. Load when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, design a feature, think through approaches, plan a new capability, or figure out what to build. Also triggers on "let's think through", "help me design", "explore options", "what's the best approach for", "I have an idea for", "before we build", or any request to design something before implementation. Enforces a hard gate: no code, no implementation until user approves a design. For executable feature specs (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then), route to `feature-spec` instead — brainstorming owns approach and architecture, not machine-readable requirements.

Analyze and optimize X (Twitter) posts for viral potential and reach using heuristics inspired by X's published open-source recommendation architecture. Use when user wants to: (1) Check if a post will go viral, (2) Score a tweet for engagement potential, (3) Optimize or rewrite a tweet for algorithmic reach, (4) Understand why a tweet underperformed, (5) Build audience in a specific niche. Triggers: "Check if this will go viral", "Make this post buzz", "Will this tweet perform well?", "Optimize my tweet", "How can I make this viral?", "rewrite this tweet", "improve my tweet engagement", "twitter algorithm", "tweet reach", "debug underperforming tweet", "バズるかチェックして", "Xでバズる投稿にして", "伸びるかチェックして", "この投稿を伸ばして", "投稿を改善して", "ツイートを最適化して"

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use this skill when writing, drafting, editing, reviewing, or revising any text to eliminate predictable AI tells, slop, and formulaic patterns. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to "deslop", "de-AI", "make it sound human," "remove AI patterns," "remove AI tropes," "clean up AI writing," fix "slop," "deslop" text, or review prose for authenticity. Also use when the user asks you to write or draft anything and wants it to sound natural rather than AI-generated. Common use cases include scientific writing (manuscripts, abstracts, cover letters, grant narratives, discussion sections, peer review responses), blog posts, newsletters, memos, reports, and any other substantial prose.

Relight a still image — change the lighting setup, color temperature, direction, or mood — on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI. Routes to Qwen Edit 2509's dedicated `relight` LoRA endpoint for purpose-built relighting, with fallback to identity-preserving edit endpoints (Nano Banana 2 Edit, GPT Image 2 Edit, FLUX Kontext Pro) when prose lighting language is enough. Use for product relighting (studio softbox → window light), portrait mood shift (overcast → golden hour), or color-grade change. Triggers on "relight", "relighting", "change the lighting", "make it golden hour", "studio lighting", "rim light", "blue hour", "soft window light", "change light direction", "color temperature", or any explicit ask to alter how a still is lit.