Results for “pull-request-review”

Use when automating GitHub issues, pull requests, reviews, CI checks, labels, releases, or engineering collaboration loops through the GitHub CLI.

Review a pull request and POST the review to GitHub via `gh pr review`. Use when asked to review a PR, or when the github-activity poller fires a PR-opened / PR-review-requested event. Always submits after drafting — a review that stays in turn output and never reaches GitHub is a non-review.

Guides a coding agent through the full GitHub pull request lifecycle: branch, commit, open PR, monitor CI, fix failures, merge, and clean up, using either the gh CLI or git plus curl.

Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, code smells, and architectural concerns, producing a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback.

Finds the open GitHub PR for the current branch and helps address review comments using the gh CLI.

Performs structured code reviews of git branches, tracking findings in a living document and optionally running deep architectural analysis with subagents.

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

Executes GitHub CLI and git commands with proper authentication, enforcing the --repo flag and providing helper functions for code review comments with suggestion blocks.

Clade coverage-driven project review — walks every VERIFY.md checkpoint, fixes failures in-session, converges when all checkpoints pass. NOT the Claude Code built-in /review (which reviews a single pull request diff) — if the user wants a PR review, route to /review-pr (Clade's PR reviewer) or the CC built-in.

Use when a finished, reviewed branch is committed and needs to be merged into the default branch in a repo that integrates directly to `main` (not via pull request).

Generate a PR description from the current branch's changes against a GitHub PR, using the gh CLI. Use when writing, drafting, or updating pull request descriptions, PR summaries, or PR bodies. Does not review code or post review comments — use code-review for local review or post-code-review-to-pr for posting a review to GitHub.

Create, refresh, and rewrite PR titles and descriptions following Sentry conventions, focusing on reviewer-facing content that describes the full branch diff.

Open a GitHub PR with a tight body — why this change, what'll surprise the reviewer, how we know it's correct — or add a pull_request_template to a repo. Use when asked to open, create, or draft a pull request, compose or regenerate a PR description, or scaffold a repo's PR template. Composes the Summary/Gotchas/Verification structure and detects an existing template first.

Realize análises de código seguindo as práticas de engenharia da Sentry. Use ao revisar pull requests, examinar alterações de código ou fornecer feedback sobre qualidade de código. Abrange segurança, performance, testes e revisão de design.

Checks a GitHub, GitLab, or Perforce (p4) pull request (or merge request, or shelved changelist) for unresolved review comments, failing status checks, and incomplete PR descriptions. Waits for pending checks to complete, categorizes issues as actionable or informational, and optionally fixes and resolves them. Use when the user wants to check a PR/MR/CL, address review feedback, or prepare a change for submission.

Run a full pull request review and post review comments directly to the current branch's GitHub PR. Requires the gh CLI to be installed and a PR to already exist for the current branch. Use when you want review feedback posted to GitHub as PR comments. For local code review without posting to GitHub, use code-review instead. Does not write or update PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that.

Handles git and GitHub operations using the gh CLI, triggered by any github.com URL. Covers creating and reviewing PRs, watching CI checks, interactive rebasing, branch cleanup, submodule management, and repository archaeology.

Write readable, maintainable code through disciplined naming, small functions, and clean error handling. Use when the user mentions "code review", "naming conventions", "function too long", "code smells", "readable code", "boy scout rule", "single responsibility", or "unit test quality". Also trigger when reviewing pull requests for readability, refactoring messy functions, debating comment styles, or improving error handling patterns. Covers SRP, comment discipline, formatting, and unit testing. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns. For architecture, see clean-architecture.

Break a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into independently-grabbable GitHub issues, one per slice, in each slice's target repo. Use when you want to turn a work-items file into GitHub issues, publish work items as issue tickets, or create implementation tickets that can be worked on and tracked on GitHub. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items to break a plan into work items first. Does not review code or post pull request comments — use post-code-review-to-pr for that.

| Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the standard chain with a PR exit. Trigger with /hyperflow:issue, "work on issue #N", "fix this issue <url>", "implement this issue", "triage issue #N and raise a PR".

Watch one or more GitHub repositories for new issues, pull requests, comments, PR reviews, and inline diff comments — emits a fresh turn each time something actionable happens. Use when you've opened PRs / issues mimir should know about review activity for, when you want operator-actionable signals for repos mimir maintains, or when you need to track upstream activity on a watched repo. Filters out events authored by mimir's own GitHub identity (set ``MIMIR_GITHUB_SELF_LOGIN``) so the bot doesn't wake itself with its own comments. Companion to the ``pollers`` framework skill (mechanics) and the ``world-scanning`` skill (catalog of *what's worth polling*). Opt-in: copy this directory into ``<home>/skills/github-poller/`` then set the env vars below.

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.