Results for “test”

Differentiates aldosterone-producing adenoma from idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia based on 18-hydroxycorticosterone levels, with APA patients generally having levels >100 ng/dL at 8:00 a.m. and IAH patients usually having levels <100 ng/dL. Use when reviewing 18-OHB test results to help subtype PA; triggers include 18-OHB >100 ng/dL (suggesting APA) or <100 ng/dL (suggesting IAH).

Process audio files with SoX (Sound eXchange). Use when a user asks to apply audio effects, mix and combine audio tracks, convert audio formats, batch process audio files, normalize volume, trim silence, add reverb or echo, change tempo or pitch, split audio files, create spectrograms, generate test tones, resample audio, or build audio processing pipelines. Covers all SoX effects, format conversion, mixing, and batch workflows.

Foundational C programming patterns covering type system, memory management, pointers, arrays, preprocessor, compilation, concurrency (pthreads, mutexes, atomics), serialization (binary, JSON, struct packing), and testing (Unity, CMocka, Check). Complete 8/8 pillar coverage. Use when writing C code, understanding manual memory management, working with system-level programming, or needing guidance on which specialized C skill to use. This is the entry point for C development.

Build Simulink models that co-simulate with Eclipse SUMO traffic simulator. Use when creating SUMO-Simulink co-simulation, traffic simulation, TraCI connection, vehicle-in-the-loop testing, or ADAS scenario validation with SUMO. Covers Server/Client setup, Reader/Writer/Actor block configuration, random traffic generation, ego vehicle control, and SUMO file creation. Also use when the user mentions SumoInterfaceLibrary, .sumocfg files, or wants to connect Simulink to an external traffic simulator.

Put the user in the hot seat — one question at a time until their plan, decision, or idea actually holds up. Use whenever the user says "hot seat me", "grill me", "stress-test this", "poke holes in this", "am I missing anything", or drops a plan and wants it challenged before anyone acts on it — even if they never say the words. Also used as a sub-procedure by the whiteboard and connotation-cop skills.

Run a full pull request review and post review comments directly to the current branch's GitHub PR. Requires the gh CLI to be installed and a PR to already exist for the current branch. Use when you want review feedback posted to GitHub as PR comments. For local code review without posting to GitHub, use code-review instead. Does not write or update PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that.

Use this skill when the user asks about FCRA adverse action procedures — what to do when a background check (MVR, criminal, drug test) returns information that may lead to denying employment or terminating a CDL driver. Covers the 5-business-day pre-adverse-action notice, FCRA Summary of Rights, final adverse action notice, state-specific add-ons (CA, NY, etc.), and how to handle disputes. Cite 15 USC § 1681 (FCRA) and 49 CFR 391.

Determines if primary aldosteronism is confirmed based on upright plasma aldosterone ≤6 ng/dL (170 nmol/L) on day 4 at 10 AM of fludrocortisone suppression test, provided plasma renin activity ≥1 ng/mL/h and plasma cortisol concentration lower than the 7 AM value to exclude ACTH confounding. Use when reviewing FST results to diagnose PA; triggers include "FST", "upright aldosterone ≤6 ng/dL", "PRA ≥1 ng/mL/h", and "cortisol drop".

Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

Decide when and how to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma — bone marrow MRD by next-generation flow (NGF) or sequencing (NGS), plus imaging MRD by PET-CT — and how to act on the result. Trigger when a clinician asks "how to assess MRD in myeloma", "MRD-negative complete response", "PET-CT for MRD", "is bone marrow MRD enough", "when to test for MRD", "next-generation flow for myeloma", or "myeloma sustained MRD negativity". Based on EHA-ESMO 2021.

Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", "technical debt", "move method", "inline variable", or "decompose conditional". Also trigger when cleaning up legacy code, preparing code for new features by restructuring, or identifying which transformation to apply to a specific code smell. Covers smell-driven refactoring, safe transformation sequences, and testing guards. For code quality foundations, see clean-code. For managing complexity, see software-design-philosophy.

Map symbol dependencies, callers, and blast radius before editing code. Load when the user asks what depends on a symbol, what breaks if they change something, blast radius of a change, reverse dependencies, or which tests cover a function. Also triggers on "who calls this", "impact of changing", "dependency map", "what uses this", "find callers", or before any non-trivial edit when safe-change is not yet active. Pairs with codebase-understanding for broad architecture; this skill is symbol-scoped and edit-gated.

Apply one logical code change with mandatory impact mapping, git snapshot, verification, and automatic revert on failure. Load when the user asks for a safe edit, verified change, one change at a time with rollback, or codespine-style edit loop. Also triggers on "safe change", "edit with verification", "don't break the build", "revert if tests fail", or any non-trivial code edit where blast radius matters. Always runs dependency-mapping first. Pairs with incremental-implementation for multi-slice work; this skill is one atomic verify cycle per invocation.

E1-Quantitative Analysis Guide with Code Generation & Sensitivity Analysis VS-Enhanced with Full 5-Phase process: Avoids obvious analyses, explores innovative methodologies Expanded to include qualitative analysis (thematic, grounded theory, content, narrative) Absorbed E4 (Analysis Code Generator) and E5 (Sensitivity Analysis - Primary Study) capabilities Use when: selecting statistical/qualitative methods, interpreting results, checking assumptions, generating code, sensitivity analysis Triggers: statistical analysis, ANOVA, regression, t-test, power analysis, assumption checking, effect size, thematic analysis, grounded theory, content analysis, narrative analysis, NVivo, ATLAS.ti, coding, qualitative data, R code, Python code, SPSS syntax, sensitivity analysis, robustness check

Break a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into independently-grabbable GitHub issues, one per slice, in each slice's target repo. Use when you want to turn a work-items file into GitHub issues, publish work items as issue tickets, or create implementation tickets that can be worked on and tracked on GitHub. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items to break a plan into work items first. Does not review code or post pull request comments — use post-code-review-to-pr for that.

Analyzes state merit review for non-covered securities offerings, applying NASAA Statements of Policy to cheap stock, promoter equity investment, voting rights, and promoter compensation. Produces examiner-ready comment responses with cap table analysis and negotiation strategy. Use when filing Reg A, Rule 504, intrastate, or direct public offerings in merit review states, responding to Blue Sky examiner comments, structuring offerings to avoid conditioning, or analyzing NASAA SOPs. Also trigger on cheap stock analysis, promoter equity tests, unequal voting rights review, state examiner correspondence, or phrases like "merit review issues" or "the state examiner sent comments."

Diagnose monogenic and syndromic obesity in children and adolescents using a structured step-by-step algorithm. Use this skill whenever a clinician suspects a genetic cause of obesity, asks about leptin deficiency, MC4R mutation, POMC deficiency, PCSK1 deficiency, leptin receptor deficiency, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Alström syndrome, or any case of early-onset severe obesity with hyperphagia. Also trigger for questions about targeted pharmacotherapy including setmelanotide or metreleptin, or when to order a genomic obesity panel. Cross-references the NHS Genomic Test Finder skill to surface the relevant R-code once a diagnosis is reached.

Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.

Redige o procedimento de producao antecipada de provas (CPC 381-383), enquadrando-o nas tres hipoteses do art. 381 (I — fundado receio de que se torne impossivel ou muito dificil verificar fatos na pendencia da acao; II — viabilizar autocomposicao; III — conhecimento previo dos fatos que justifique ou evite o ajuizamento), sem exigencia de urgencia nos incisos II e III, com competencia do foro da producao ou do domicilio do reu (381 §2), sem prevencao (381 §3), e sem o juiz se pronunciar sobre o fato (382 §2). Use quando o operador disser produzir prova antes, producao antecipada, perpetuar prova, pericia antes da acao, ouvir testemunha antes.

Break a trusted implementation plan (or other provided context) into independently-grabbable, atomic work items, written to a single work-items.md file. Use when the user wants to convert a plan into work items, create implementation tickets or tasks, divide a plan into work units, or break the plan down into grabbable pieces. Do not use when there is no implementation plan yet or the plan is not yet trusted — use plan-implementation to produce the plan or iterative-plan-review to harden it first. Does not sequence work into demoable delivery phases — use plan-a-phased-build for that. Does not write code — use tdd to implement a work item.

Use this skill whenever the user wants to conduct an event study, create event study plots, test for parallel trends, implement difference-in-differences designs, or work with any panel data estimation that involves pre/post treatment comparisons. Trigger on phrases like "event study", "parallel trends", "pre-trends", "dynamic treatment effects", "leads and lags", "TWFE", "two-way fixed effects", "staggered adoption", "staggered treatment", "difference-in-differences", "DiD", "Sun and Abraham", "Callaway and Sant'Anna", "de Chaisemartin", "Borusyak", "did_multiplegt", "fixest", "did2s", "bacon decomposition", or any reference to plotting coefficients around a treatment event. Also trigger when the user uploads panel data and wants to estimate treatment effects with variation in treatment timing. All code is in R.

Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.

Surfaces Han's shared standard for explaining technical work to a reader who will not implement it into the calling skill's own context, so the caller writes its escalations, confirmation turns, and stops as a concrete outcome the reader could observe rather than as a mechanism. Use when a skill is about to ask a person a question, stop for an input, or explain a technical consequence to someone who will not open the code. Governs what a run says to a person in a turn, where readability-guidance governs the shape of a written deliverable. Runs in the caller's context and hands control straight back; it does not produce a deliverable of its own, rewrite anything, or judge the caller's work. Carries guidance only and adds no self-check step.

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

Cut a Han release: update CHANGELOG.md with the changes since the last release, bump every plugin that changed, tag every plugin as {plugin-name}--v{version} so a version-constrained dependency can resolve, and publish a GitHub release whose notes attribute every merged pull request to its author, credit every closed issue to the person who opened it, the people who contributed to it, and the people who worked on the fix, and link back to the full changelog for that version. Han ships as a parent meta-plugin (`han`) plus child plugins (`han-core`, `han-github`, `han-reporting`, and any future `han-*` extension); the skill versions each plugin independently and tags each one independently, with the release attaching to the parent's tag. Use when releasing, cutting a release, shipping a new Han version, publishing release notes, or tagging a version. Reads each plugin's target version from its plugin.json; when a plugin has not been bumped past the latest tag yet, it proposes a semantic-versioning bump and conf