Results for “star”

| Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the standard chain with a PR exit. Trigger with /hyperflow:issue, "work on issue #N", "fix this issue <url>", "implement this issue", "triage issue #N and raise a PR".

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

Access ClinPGx pharmacogenomics data (the successor to PharmGKB) to query gene-drug interactions, CPIC/DPWG dosing guidelines, drug labels, and pharmacogene records. Use when interpreting pharmacogenes (CYP2D6, CYP2C19, TPMT, DPYD, SLCO1B1), looking up genotype-guided drug dosing, checking PGx drug-safety associations (e.g. HLA-B*57:01 and abacavir), or supporting precision medicine and clinical pharmacogenomics decisions. For star-allele definitions/frequencies see PharmVar; for germline/somatic variant pathogenicity see alterlab-clinvar. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Structured verbal communication framework for Senior PM and TPM interviews. Use when preparing for interviews, rehearsing answers, practicing English (or Spanish) delivery under pressure, or when any interview question needs to be answered in a crisp, structured way. Covers SCQA/STAR/C-F-I scaffolding, answer templates by question type, pushback handling, English- and Spanish-under-pressure tactics, and post-interview debrief methodology. Trigger on any variant of "how do I answer this?", "rehearse with me", "how would you say this?", or "practice interview question".

WOLVERINE v2.0 — HYPE alpha hunter. Entry-only scanner, DSL-exit-only architecture. v1.1 lost -22.7% because the scanner's thesis exit chopped 25/27 trades before DSL could manage them. v2.0 removes thesis exit entirely. Scanner decides entries (score 8+, 4H/1H aligned, SM consensus). DSL manages all exits (wide Phase 1 for HYPE volatility, trailing tiers starting at +15% ROE). Leverage lowered to 7x. Max 4 entries/day. 3-hour cooldown between entries. DSL exit managed by plugin runtime via runtime.yaml.

Composite skill — one-pass cleanup of stale local branches, dead worktrees, merged branches, and abandoned remote PR branches. Chains `git fetch --prune` → `clean_gone` (kill [gone] branches) → worktree prune + offer-to-remove dead worktrees → list-and-delete branches merged to main and release → delete remote PR branches whose PRs merged >7 days ago. Use instead of running `clean_gone` alone — that only catches half the rot. Daily-friction composite; fires on "clean up branches", "branch hygiene", "stale worktrees", and on session start when local branch count > 30.

Full project analysis for an unfamiliar Sage/Acorn/Lando project — discovers CPTs, routes, ACF field groups, Livewire components, Service Providers, active plans, installed packages; produces a structured project overview with health status and recommended next steps. Invoke for: "/onboarding", "I'm new to this project", "what does this project do", "show me what exists", "project overview", "orient me to this codebase", "what exists in this project". Skip when: you already know the project — the session-start hook already provided basic stack info; invoke the target skill directly instead.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

Opens a conversational planning session for a feature, bug, or ticket. Investigates the repo, discusses the approach with the user until a solution is agreed, and only then writes the plan to docs/plans/. Use whenever the user invokes it, describes a problem to solve, pastes a ticket, mentions an incident, or asks to plan a non-trivial change. Also on "plan this", "analyze this first", "what would we need to touch", "let's start with this" — or in Spanish "planeá", "analizá esto antes", "qué habría que tocar", "arranquemos con esto".

Turn a new rep's start date into a ramp that ends in quota, not confusion. Builds a 30/60/90 onboarding plan with milestones at each gate, a certification bar they have to clear before they carry full load, and the manager touchpoints that catch a slow ramp early. Built for B2B sales managers and enablement, customizable to your role and motion. Trigger on "build an onboarding plan", "30/60/90 for a new AE", "how do I ramp this rep", "certification checklist", "onboarding milestones", or any new-hire ramp.

Build lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from Getting Real, Rework, and Shape Up. Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat marker sketch", "build less", "underdo the competition", or "opinionated software". Also trigger when cutting scope to ship faster, running small teams, avoiding long-term roadmaps, or eliminating meetings. Covers shaping, betting, building, and the art of saying no. For MVP validation, see lean-startup. For design sprints, see design-sprint.

Select oral and injectable glucose-lowering agents for a newly diagnosed patient with type 2 diabetes using a compelling-indication hierarchy (heart failure → ASCVD → DKD → obesity) followed by glucose-pattern matching. Incorporates modern GLP-1 receptor agonists — Ozempic (semaglutide SC, T2D), Mounjaro (tirzepatide), and Wegovy/Noveltreat (semaglutide 2.4 mg, obesity). Use when a clinician asks "what drug to start for newly diagnosed T2D", "which OAD to use", "first-line diabetes medication", "SGLT2i vs GLP-1 in new T2D", or presents a newly diagnosed T2D patient needing a personalised medication plan.

Run a pre-mortem — imagine the project has already failed one year from now and work backward to find the root causes before they happen. Load when the user asks for a pre-mortem, wants to imagine failure before committing, asks "what could go wrong before we start", "assume this fails — why", "risk analysis before launch", "what kills this project", "what could go wrong", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a pre-mortem frame. Based on Gary Klein's prospective hindsight method, which surfaces failure causes more effectively than forward risk analysis. Most useful right before a major commitment.

Metal/wgpu/WGSL shader surfaces for native Rust gpui apps (Zed-family, pd-console), stockpiled with beautiful copy-pasteable shader-toy examples. Use for custom GPU fragment passes behind/around gpui panes: ocean/water shaders, pixelated waves and boats, a living harbor, dithered chrome borders, sonar sweeps, aurora/starfields, CRT/scanline post. Trigger on: wgsl, wgpu, metal shader, gpui shader, shadertoy, fragment shader, SDF, noise/fbm, ordered dithering, pixelation, render-to-texture, "pixelated waves and boats", living harbor water. NOT for: web/GLSL/three.js shaders (use a web tool), non-shader gpui motion (use rust-gpui-motion), general GUI layout/color (use beautiful-gui-design), CLI/TUI (use beautiful-cli-design).

이미 굴러가는 저장소에서 코드를 바꾸는 요청이면 크기와 무관하게, 파일을 건드리기 전에 이 스킬로 GitHub 이슈부터 등록합니다. 반대로 빈 폴더나 방금 git init 한 프로젝트에 package.json·tsconfig·lint 설정·기본 레이아웃 같은 초기 뼈대를 세우는 일은 여기 해당하지 않으니 그냥 만들어 주세요. 기능 추가, 버그 수정, 화면이 깨지거나 안 보이거나 잘리거나 새로고침하면 초기화되는 문제, 중복 호출·느린 응답 같은 동작 개선, 안 쓰는 코드·플래그·스크립트 삭제가 전부 해당합니다. 증상만 적어 보낸 버그 리포트, "이거 지워도 될까?" 처럼 물음표로 끝나는 정리 요청, 특정 파일·컴포넌트를 콕 집어 고쳐 달라는 요청도 똑같이 해당합니다. 사용자가 고칠 파일 경로와 구현 방법까지 지정해 줬더라도 바로 편집에 들어가지 않고 이슈부터 만듭니다. 사용자가 "이슈" 를 한 마디도 꺼내지 않아도, 요청이 한 줄짜리로 보여도, 이슈 번호가 함께 오지 않았다면 코드를 읽기 전에 먼저 이 스킬을 탑니다. 한 요청에 독립 작업이 여러 개 섞여 있으면 그만큼 이슈를 나눠 만듭니다. 저장소가 이슈를 만들 단계인지 판정하고, 항목마다 유사 이슈를 검색하고, issue-start 가 그대로 이어받을 형식으로 초안을 만들어 승인받고 라벨과 함께 등록합니다. 등록을 마친 뒤에는 라벨이 빠진 기존 이슈까지 이어서 점검해 보정합니다. `~/.issue/settings.json`의 `issue.createMode`가 `direct`면 암묵적으로 발동한 뒤 조용히 빠져 원래 변경 요청을 계속하지만, `$issue-create`, "이슈 만들어줘", "이슈부터 등록" 같은 명시 요청에는 설정과 관계없이 씁니다. 이미 이슈 번호를 받은 착수 요청은 issue-start, 구현이 끝나 증거·PR 차례면 issue-end, 워크트리 통합은 issue-merge 를 쓰고, 코드는 그대로 둔 채 이슈 목록 조회나 라벨 정리만 원하거나 커밋이 거의 없는 새 스캐폴딩 프로젝트라면 쓰지 않습니다.

YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT answer directly) when the user describes a new product idea, asks whether something is worth building, wants to think through design decisions for something that doesn't exist yet, or is exploring a concept before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review. (gstack)

Simulator.Company graph structure specialist. Use when the user wants to build, edit, analyze, inspect, or ask questions about business process graphs, flowcharts, algorithms, actors (nodes), links (edges), or layers (visual views) in Simulator.Company. Trigger on any of these intents: — Creating: "create graph", "build flowchart", "new diagram", "add actor", "add block to graph", "create algorithm", "draw flowchart", "digital twin", "create process on graph", "build process diagram", "FlowchartBlock", "startStop", "predefinedProcess". — Editing: "edit graph", "update actor", "rename node", "change color", "move actor", "add step to flowchart", "modify diagram", "restructure process", "add edge", "remove link", "reorder steps", "update layer". — Syncing: "push graph", "pull graph", "sync graph", "push changes", "apply edits to layer". — Querying / analysis: "what actors are on this layer", "show me the graph", "who is connected to", "find actor", "list nodes", "describe the process", "analyze the flowchart",

Simulator.Company chat & messaging specialist — sending messages to a user, and creating or reusing p2p (1:1) and group chats. In Simulator a chat is an actor of the Events system form (data.chatType = "p2p" | "group"), its participants are the actor's access-rule members, and its messages are `comment` reactions. Use when the user wants to "message", "write to", "DM", "send a message to" someone, "open a chat with", "start a conversation", or "reply in the chat". Activate on "write a message to user N", "send N a message", "open a chat with", "message someone", "напиши повідомлення користувачу", "надішли повідомлення", "відкрий чат з", "почни розмову з", "напиши юзеру", "напиши сообщение пользователю", "отправь сообщение", "открой чат с", "напиши в чат". For comments/approvals on an arbitrary actor (not a chat) use `simulator-reactions`; for files use `simulator-attachments`; for sharing/access in general use `simulator-access`.

Write the context brief a first-time tester gets before testing an app, tool, codebase, or product — it explains WHAT the thing is and why it exists, while deliberately withholding HOW anything works. The companion to the fresh-eyes skill; the brief it produces is the "starting information" handed to a fresh-eyes tester. Use this whenever the user is preparing a fresh-eyes or first-time-user test and needs the setup material, or says things like "describe my app without giving anything away", "write the context card for the tester", "explain what it is but not how to use it", "set up the newcomer test", "what would the tester be told going in?", or wants a spoiler-free description of their product. Also use it when someone asks for the briefing/intro that a new tester, new hire, or evaluator should receive before first contact with the thing being tested.

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.