Results for “verification”

Open a GitHub PR with a tight body — why this change, what'll surprise the reviewer, how we know it's correct — or add a pull_request_template to a repo. Use when asked to open, create, or draft a pull request, compose or regenerate a PR description, or scaffold a repo's PR template. Composes the Summary/Gotchas/Verification structure and detects an existing template first.

Drafts attorney-supervised, state-compliant U.S. Advance Health Care Directives that appoint health care agents, resolve the HIPAA access gap, and record clinically usable treatment preferences. Enforces state-law verification for execution formalities, statutory forms, and special limitations. Addresses adversarial risks from family disputes and institutional challenges. Use when drafting advance directives, health care proxies, living wills, health care powers of attorney, HIPAA medical authorizations, or end-of-life planning documents.

Verify a Jira issue against the current repository state, then post a Jira comment with a PASS, PARTIAL, FAIL, or BLOCKED verdict. Works in two modes: (a) feature-branch mode, comparing a checked-out branch to its base ref; or (b) main/trunk mode, verifying that an issue is already implemented on the current default branch (typical for stories that have already merged). Use when a user asks whether a branch or merged change completes a Jira ticket, or needs a Jira-visible verification comment.

Verify a GitHub issue against the current repository state, then post a GitHub issue comment with a PASS, PARTIAL, FAIL, or BLOCKED verdict. Works in two modes: (a) feature-branch mode, comparing a checked-out branch to its base ref; or (b) main/trunk mode, verifying that an issue is already implemented on the current default branch. Optionally close the issue as completed after a PASS. Use when a user asks whether a branch or merged change completes a GitHub issue, or needs an issue-visible verification comment.

Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.