Results for “eval”

Advises against testosterone therapy in men with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer treatment due to very limited data and potential risk of progression. Consider when a patient has a rising PSA after definitive therapy and the clinician evaluates testosterone for hypogonadism, questioning whether TTh is safe in BCR.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

A protocol risk analyst and yield reality checker for decentralized finance. Evaluates protocol safety before deposit. Calculates real yield after gas, emissions, impermanent loss, and token depreciation. Identifies common rug-risk patterns in tokenomics, liquidity, and governance. Advisory only—no wallet access, no private key handling, no transaction signing, no on-chain execution.

Resolve GitHub PR feedback end-to-end for the branch you are on. Use when you need to fetch all comments on the branch PR, evaluate whether each comment still applies, decide whether it should be addressed, implement fixes, run compile/tests with retry-on-failure, then commit and push the result.

Evaluates likelihood of primary aldosteronism by measuring plasma aldosterone suppression after oral captopril; normal suppression ≥30% makes PA unlikely, while lack of suppression with persistently suppressed plasma renin activity suggests PA. Use when assessing captopril challenge test (CCT) results for PA diagnosis in patients with positive aldosterone-to-renin ratio.

Recommends measurement of plasma ACTH to establish primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) diagnosis in patients with confirmed cortisol deficiency; a plasma ACTH concentration ≥2-fold the upper limit of the reference range supports PAI. Use when evaluating plasma ACTH in a patient with low morning cortisol or abnormal corticotropin stimulation test.

Identifies patients with adrenal tumors on CT who should undergo dexamethasone suppression test to evaluate for autonomous cortisol co-secretion. Triggers include when a clinician finds an adrenal tumor on CT and asks 'Should I test for cortisol co-secretion?' or is planning AVS for a tumor >3.0 cm.

Understand and trade futures contracts on commodities, indices, crypto, and event outcomes. Covers contract mechanics, margin, settlement, spreads, and risk. Use when analyzing futures markets, understanding contract specs, evaluating margin requirements, or building futures strategies. Also trigger for 'futures contract', 'commodities trading', 'futures margin', 'contract specs', 'futures spread', 'oil futures', 'crypto futures', or 'index futures'.

Guides privacy impact assessment for emerging technologies including IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, and digital twins. Covers risk identification methodology, proportionality assessment, and technology-specific privacy challenges. Activate when evaluating new technology adoption, innovation projects, or emerging tech procurement. Keywords: PIA, emerging technology, IoT, blockchain, AR/VR, quantum computing, digital twins, innovation privacy.

Interprets the saline infusion test (SIT) to assess the probability of primary aldosteronism when a patient has a positive aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) and requires confirmatory testing. Triggers include evaluating post‑infusion plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) after a positive ARR, hypertension work‑up, or when deciding whether to proceed to adrenal venous sampling (AVS).

Econometrics skill for Difference-in-Differences (DID) analysis. Activates when the user asks about: "difference in differences", "DID", "DiD", "diff-in-diff", "parallel trends", "treatment group", "control group", "pre-treatment", "post-treatment", "policy evaluation", "natural experiment", "staggered DID", "event study regression", "two-way fixed effects DID", "callaway santanna", "sun and abraham", "双重差分", "倍差法", "平行趋势", "处理组", "对照组", "政策评估", "事件研究", "交错DID", "渐进处理"

Establishes age- and gender-specific blood pressure goals for pediatric patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) using published normative data to assess treatment adequacy and avoid over-treatment. Use when managing hypertension in children with PA to evaluate if BP is adequately controlled; triggers include pediatric PA hypertension, BP not normalized with glucocorticoid therapy, and need for age‑specific BP targets.

Generate 5–10 business idea candidates from a blank page or a founder's domain context — using pain mining, jobs-to-be-done, trend × capability mapping, constraint relaxation, adjacency search, and founder-market-fit prompts. Each candidate is a structured idea card (segment, JTBD, current alternative, why-now, distribution wedge, monetisation, "feels like"). Load when the user asks to generate business ideas, brainstorm startup ideas, find ideas to work on, says "what business should I start", "give me startup ideas", "I don't know what to build", "ideate ventures", "blank-page idea generation", "find me a startup idea", "explore business opportunities". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "Uber for X" / "AI for X" with no specific JTBD, "everyone" segments, and idea cards missing any of the 7 required fields. Does NOT design or evaluate ideas generated — for that use `idea-evaluation`.

Determines whether to perform adrenal venous sampling (AVS) to lateralize aldosterone excess in patients with confirmed primary aldosteronism (PA) who are being evaluated for surgical treatment. Indicated when surgery is feasible and desired by the patient, or when subtype workup is planned for a surgical candidate, especially in those younger than 35 years with spontaneous hypokalemia, marked aldosterone excess, and unilateral adrenal lesions on CT.

Use when defining a feature's purpose and user value before building it, writing user stories, mapping user flows end-to-end, prioritizing what to build next, evaluating whether a feature solves a real problem, or reviewing scope to prevent over-engineering. Activate when user says "what should I build", "plan the feature", "is this the right approach", "define the requirements", or presents an idea without a clear user need.

Apply meta-principles of software craftsmanship: DRY, orthogonality, tracer bullets, and design by contract. Use when the user mentions "best practices", "pragmatic approach", "broken windows", "tracer bullet", "software craftsmanship", "technical debt prevention", "prototype vs tracer bullet", or "code ownership". Also trigger when evaluating build-vs-buy decisions, designing estimation approaches, or choosing between reversible and irreversible architectural decisions. Covers estimation, domain languages, and reversibility. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns.

Failure diagnosis, DAG mutation, and escalation engine for the WinDAGs meta-DAG. Receives failure information and quality vectors from the Evaluator. Classifies failures on four dimensions. Follows a five-level escalation ladder. Applies seven mutation types with saga compensation. Enforces BC-EXEC-002, BC-EXEC-003, BC-FAIL-002, BC-FAIL-005. Activate when operating as the Mutator role in the meta-DAG, when diagnosing node failures, when restructuring a DAG at runtime, or when deciding escalation level.

Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.

Legal-specific Argument Ranking Engine. Hodnotí právní argumenty 17-sloupcovým scoringem (síla, bezpečnost, dopad, riziko + 10 legal-specific kritérií: Compliance s novelou 2026, Evidence backing, Time-sensitivity, per-document mapping, R-static/R-reversal split, Tom-weight bonus, C-XX/M-XX/N-XX/D-XX integrace). Output: priorizovaný seznam argumentů s kategoriemi CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED/SUMMARY a per-document bundles (PR/§909/40_06/195). Použití: pre-prioritizace argumentů před F11.x review, Phase 2 Verify input, DÁVKA 3, výživné L04, AT podání. VŽDY použij tento skill, když Tom (nebo legal/strat) zmíní: /lare, lare, argument ranking, ARE matrix, score arguments, prioritize arguments, argument bundle, CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED, ARE_F11, LARE_F11, legal argument evaluation, argument scoring, compliance scoring, Tom-weight.

Write the context brief a first-time tester gets before testing an app, tool, codebase, or product — it explains WHAT the thing is and why it exists, while deliberately withholding HOW anything works. The companion to the fresh-eyes skill; the brief it produces is the "starting information" handed to a fresh-eyes tester. Use this whenever the user is preparing a fresh-eyes or first-time-user test and needs the setup material, or says things like "describe my app without giving anything away", "write the context card for the tester", "explain what it is but not how to use it", "set up the newcomer test", "what would the tester be told going in?", or wants a spoiler-free description of their product. Also use it when someone asks for the briefing/intro that a new tester, new hire, or evaluator should receive before first contact with the thing being tested.