Results for “access-review”

Guides designing or reviewing Lightning Web Components for keyboard access, semantic labeling, and focus management, prioritizing base components over custom ARIA.

Provides a structured code review checklist covering security, performance, correctness, maintainability, testing, accessibility, and documentation, with a three-pass review process and guidance on severity levels and anti-patterns.

Review UI implementations against design quality standards and design system compliance, or create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces from scratch.

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Prevents SOQL injection and enforces CRUD, FLS, and sharing in Apex queries, with guidance for building, reviewing, and troubleshooting secure data access.

Turn interactive commit reviews back on for the current herdr workspace.

Systematically test web applications for broken access control vulnerabilities including privilege escalation, missing function-level checks, and insecure direct object references.

Provides production-grade TypeScript guidance for React and Next.js, covering type narrowing, component props, generics, runtime validation, data fetching, state management, performance, accessibility, and code review.

任意のリポジトリ（アプリ/ライブラリ/運用スクリプト/コンテンツ等）の種別を判定し、 種別に応じた評価軸（品質・テスト・依存、または検証ゲート等）で**実測ベース**評価して優先度付き改善案を出すスキル。 言語非依存（Python は AST 詳細・その他は近似と明記）。ベンダーコード混入・除外の空振り・偽の成功終了コードなど、 「黙って間違った数値を出す」失敗を構造的に封じる。 「リポジトリレビューして」「コード品質を評価して」「このプロジェクトを診断して」「包括レビュー」「repo-review」 「アーキテクチャ評価して」等で発火。/repo-review でも起動。

Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.

Address PR review comments by fetching, evaluating, fixing, replying, pushing, and re-requesting review.

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.

Reviews lockfiles, installers, provenance, CI permissions, dependency confusion, artifacts, registries, and publishing.

Runs a structured code review as a pre-commit or pre-ship gate, supporting multiple review engines and scope governance.

Readability Review

Routes quality reviews to specialized critic agents based on file type or flags, covering peer review, code review, and manuscript polish.

Reviewer Role Session

Analyze auto-memory for promotion candidates, stale entries, consolidation opportunities, and health metrics. Use when the user runs /si:review or asks what has been learned and what should be promoted or pruned.

Creates data-driven infographics and charts as accessible SVG. Use when visualizing data, choosing a chart type, generating an SVG chart or infographic, or reviewing a visualization for clarity and accuracy.

Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, macOS-specific APIs, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.

Builds and reviews Apex code that constructs SOQL/SOSL at runtime, inspects schema metadata, and accesses fields dynamically, with guidance on injection prevention and FLS enforcement.

Enforces a canonical UI/UX ruleset with 14 sections and 70+ prioritized rules (P0–P3) for implementing, reviewing, or auditing UI components, referencing tokens from a theme reference.

Transforms source materials (URLs, PDFs, DOCX, Markdown, text, screenshots) into a single-file HTML web article that is visually polished, offline-accessible, and shareable, using a structured editorial workflow with checkpoints and quality reviews.

Use to review how call recordings are notified, stored, accessed, redacted and deleted, including the parts that differ from text conversations. Trigger for "review our call recording practices", "do we need to tell customers we're recording", "who can listen to our calls", recording retention, card details spoken on a call, or a request for a customer's own recording.

Set up the Discord channel — save the bot token and review access policy. Use when the user pastes a Discord bot token, asks to configure Discord, asks "how do I set this up" or "who can reach me," or wants to check channel status.

Set up the Discord channel — save the bot token and review access policy. Use when the user pastes a Discord bot token, asks to configure Discord, asks "how do I set this up" or "who can reach me," or wants to check channel status.

Use when reviewing or refactoring code that pulls apart another object's private representation, such as raw limb/byte/slot access, slice constructors, or helper methods that expose internal storage. Guides agents to find representation envy and suggest moving behavior onto the object that owns the representation, using live-image Genie tools when working in Pharo.

Compose a provider-neutral AI team by tiering accessible models on cost-efficiency, capability, latency, and governance, then mapping the 8 processkit role archetypes onto catalog Roles + RoleSlots inside a chartering Scope. Use when bootstrapping a new project team, rotating after a provider change, or quarterly rebalancing. Triggers: "create my AI team", "compose a team", "rebalance the team", "review the team".