Results for “criteria-analysis”

Provides a rigorous thinking partner profile that challenges assumptions, calibrates claims to evidence, and improves decision quality under uncertainty.

Analyzes .NET project code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify risk hotspots, methods blocking coverage gains, and prioritize where to add tests.

当分析个人或他人成就差异的根本原因，并寻求提升路径时

Analyze closed deals and lost opportunities for patterns

Multi-dimensional lead qualification scoring. Evaluates leads against BANT criteria, firmographic fit, behavioral signals, and intent indicators. Outputs qualified/disqualified verdict with detailed reasoning.

Identify and prioritize risks by impact and controllability. Use for risk management, project planning, and strategic decision support.

当个人或组织经历重大环境变化、目标转换或阶段性迷茫时，用于理解当前所处阶段、预测发展轨迹并规划应对策略

Design grading plans. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grading-plan related tasks.

Use to build and maintain a reusable bank of QA criteria as observable decision rules shared across scorecards. Trigger for "criterion library", "standardise our QA criteria", "write better rubric items", "was professional is too vague", versioning criteria across teams, or turning adjectives into pass/fail decision rules with examples.

在启动一个重要项目或关键行动之前，用于主动识别和防范风险

Score Analyzer

实现问题分析和技能调用的完整思考链路，支持AI快速识别和调用合适的技能。

Econometrics skill for Difference-in-Differences (DID) analysis. Activates when the user asks about: "difference in differences", "DID", "DiD", "diff-in-diff", "parallel trends", "treatment group", "control group", "pre-treatment", "post-treatment", "policy evaluation", "natural experiment", "staggered DID", "event study regression", "two-way fixed effects DID", "callaway santanna", "sun and abraham", "双重差分", "倍差法", "平行趋势", "处理组", "对照组", "政策评估", "事件研究", "交错DID", "渐进处理"

Define roles and responsibilities using RACI matrix. Use for process improvement, organizational design, project management, and change initiatives.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Classify reply sentiment and determine next action

Perform a detailed SWOT analysis — strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendations. Use when doing strategic assessment, competitive analysis, or evaluating a product or business position.

Strategic patterns for solving intractable problems through cascading approximation, self-improvement, and heterogeneous evaluation from DeepMind's AlphaGo system

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

Transforms scattered competitor data into a decision-ready product strategy report with positioning maps, feature matrices, pricing analysis, and opportunity windows.

Conduct gap analyses between current and desired states. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with gap-analysis related tasks.