Results for “cross-review”

Write, review, refactor, and optimize Slang shader code for graphics, compute, tessellation, and ray tracing pipelines with cross-compilation support.

Runs independent AI CLI reviewers over phase plans and merges their feedback into a REVIEWS.md file.

Repair and verify cross-references between SKILL.md files after a skill is created, renamed, removed, or restructured. Ensures every skill that calls another skill references the correct name, and every skill that is called has accurate "Called by" context. Load after universal-skill-creator creates a skill, after improve-skills completes a cycle, after a skill is renamed or removed, or when the user asks to fix cross-references, sync skill links, repair broken skill references, update skill cross-links, check skill references, or "are cross-links correct".

Establishes baseline cross-project coding conventions for naming, readability, immutability, and code-quality review, with pointers to framework-specific skills.

Audits source code across C++, Android, iOS, and Web to classify files, detect embedded third-party libraries, and produce four-level verdicts with interactive HTML reports.

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

Reviews code diffs or explicit file sets through independent correctness and QA lenses, producing a severity-ordered verdict for pre-merge audits or review gates.

Audits Rust codebases for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes.

Provides a structured reasoning protocol for diagnosing complex relationships, organizations, institutions, public disputes, or long-term evolution using the CrossFrame framework, with explicit invocation required.

Run an AI-assisted PR code review using multi-layer lenses with confidence scoring.

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Use when a commit's changes are finished and about to be presented for review. Runs the checks that catch the objections the user would otherwise raise, before they spend time reviewing.

Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md. Identifying inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items.

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Runs a structured code review as a pre-commit or pre-ship gate, supporting multiple review engines and scope governance.

Clade coverage-driven project review — walks every VERIFY.md checkpoint, fixes failures in-session, converges when all checkpoints pass. NOT the Claude Code built-in /review (which reviews a single pull request diff) — if the user wants a PR review, route to /review-pr (Clade's PR reviewer) or the CC built-in.

Runs the current git diff through the Codex CLI for an independent, read-only second-opinion review, then triages findings back into the session for Claude to apply fixes.

Analyzes evaluation patterns across completed plans and evolves the superpowers checklists accordingly.

Use to map where support conversation data actually goes — systems, vendors, countries, AI providers — and compare it against what the privacy notice and records say. Trigger for "where does our support data go", "map our data flows", "which vendors process our conversations", cross-border transfer review, ROPA accuracy for support, or a new tool that was connected without a review.

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Use for designing or reviewing resilient asynchronous HTTP call paths that combine HTTPX, Tenacity, and asyncio: client lifetime, time budgets, retry eligibility, backoff, concurrency, cancellation, and idempotency. Do not use for generic HTTPX, retry, or asyncio questions that do not cross these boundaries.

Manages persistent coding sessions across multiple AI coding engines including Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Cursor, and OpenCode, with support for multi-agent councils, cross-session messaging, deep planning, parallel code review, and autonomous workspace iteration.

Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.