Results for “deliberation”

Decide

Convene a four-voice council of advisors to surface structured disagreement and tradeoffs for ambiguous decisions, go/no-go calls, and multi-path choices.

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

Convenes a council of specialized agents to debate important decisions, synthesizing independent perspectives into a structured recommendation and optional spec document.

Council

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

Alias for $plan --consensus

Decide

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

Police the project's vocabulary — bust vague terms, keep the CONTEXT.md glossary sharp, and lock in decisions worth remembering as ADRs. Use when the user debates naming, says "what should we call this", asks to pin down terminology, wants a decision recorded, or when another skill (hot-seat, whiteboard) surfaces a decision that clears the ADR bar. Just reading the glossary for vocabulary is NOT this skill — trigger only when the words or decisions are being changed.

Design experiments and studies before data collection — choosing a design, randomizing, blocking, and laying out treatment combinations so results are interpretable.

Record a decision: finalized → ADR (optionally rule + guide or spec + plan); open proposal → RFC. Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'make it a standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y'. Not for feature planning or documenting existing code.

Write clear design rationale that connects decisions to user needs, business goals, and principles.

Use after Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often substantial) new experiments by impact × feasibility, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and closes the "completeness" gaps reviewers demand. Do not run before the experiments and revision are actually done.

Condenses complex materials into a one-page executive decision memo with recommendation, evidence, tradeoffs, and next actions.

Deliberative consultation with Gemini CLI. Ask, evaluate, critique, iterate until workable agreement.

Pauses mid-conversation to reassess direction, assumptions, and bias, then recommends whether to continue, pivot, or pause.

Structured brainstorming for projects and features. Explores multiple options before implementation.

Consensus planning entrypoint that auto-gates vague ralph/autopilot/team requests before execution

Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".

Deliberative consultation with Codex CLI. Ask, evaluate, critique, iterate until workable agreement.

Drafts a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) under FRCP 50(b) or state equivalents, with alternative new-trial request. Builds element-by-element evidentiary insufficiency arguments using transcript citations and preserves the appellate record. Use when drafting JNOV motions, post-trial motions, renewed judgment as a matter of law, or challenging jury verdicts for insufficient evidence.

Recommends a shared decision‑making process that provides patients with quantitative estimates of the expected weight effect of antidepressants to inform drug choice, also considering expected treatment length. Triggers include clinician questions such as ‘How should I discuss weight‑change risks with this patient starting an antidepressant?’ or ‘What tool can I use to show expected weight impact of sertraline vs bupropion?’.

Decide the highest-value safe thing to do right now in the active repo or workspace.

Structure a hard business decision — frame the choice, score options against weighted criteria, run a pre-mortem and stress-test, and produce a recommendation + decision record for any active brand

Clarifies ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions.