Results for “here”

Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use `improve-animations` or `review-animations` instead. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

Turn a cold start into a warm one. Build a single orientation document for a project, account, or workspace, what it is, where things live, the decisions made so far, the open items, and the next move, so a new session or a new teammate is productive in minutes instead of days. Trigger on "get me up to speed", "onboard someone to this", "what's the context here", "brief a new session", "orient me on this account", or any cold-start on work already in motion.

Analyse experiment results, run validity checks (SRM, exposure parity, data integrity, novelty/primacy), interpret causally, make a ship/iterate/kill decision against the pre-declared rule, and append to cumulative learnings. Forces honest readouts — strips significance claims from underpowered or peek-violating tests; never lets directional results masquerade as causal wins. Load when results exist, or when the user says "read out this experiment", "analyse the test", "did the test win", "interpret the results", "what did we learn", "ship or kill", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

Write a rigorous, decision-grade experiment spec — falsifiable hypothesis, primary metric, guardrails, randomisation unit, exposure definition, method (A/B, holdout, switchback, quasi-experiment, MAB), MDE/duration plan, peek policy, validity threats, and pre-committed decision rule. Platform-agnostic. Load when the user has a candidate experiment and needs to spec it before launch, or says "spec this experiment", "write the test plan", "design this A/B test", "what's the hypothesis", "how big a sample do we need", "how long should we run this", "define the metrics for this test", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

Translate an approved experiment spec into a launch runbook — platform binding (PostHog primary), feature flag setup, assignment unit, exposure event definition, instrumentation QA, dashboard wiring, ramp plan, monitoring, and rollback procedure. Platform-agnostic core with one strong PostHog adapter shipped; GrowthBook, Statsig, LaunchDarkly, Optimizely, and Eppo documented as a single mapping table the user adapts. Load when a spec is approved and ready to launch, or when the user says "set up the experiment", "wire this up in PostHog", "implement the test", "create the runbook", "launch checklist for this test", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

本地 pub2gg 全链路：文章→DeepSeek排版→GitHub存稿→WordPress发布→Telegram推送。不依赖阿里云中继，纯 Hermes 本地执行。

Implements real-time pub/sub messaging with Ably's edge infrastructure, covering presence, message history, and token authentication.

Current weather and forecasts with wttr.in via curl for locations, rain, temperature, travel planning.

Configure Gemini and Codex CLI tools with Cloudflare AI Gateway endpoints and MCP servers.

Query Google Places for text search, place details, resolve, reviews, or scriptable JSON via goplaces.

disk reference tool

core reference tool

Perform an HTTP POST with JSON body and return the response

diff reference tool

Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

Orchestrate one or more thinking frameworks to work through any problem, decision, document, or idea rigorously. Diagnoses which frameworks fit — inversion, pre-mortem, assumption-mapping, socratic, adversarial-hat — then guides the user through them in the right sequence. Load when the user asks for deep thinking, says "help me think through this properly", "apply your best thinking frameworks", "I need to think carefully before deciding", or "what thinking tools should I use here". Also the entry point for any complex problem where the right framework is unclear. Covers product decisions, engineering tradeoffs, personal decisions, strategy, creative challenges — any domain.

Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

Strip a problem to its irreducible fundamental truths and rebuild the solution from the ground up — free from analogy, convention, and inherited assumptions. Load when the user feels constrained by how something has always been done, when existing solutions feel expensive or inefficient for no good reason, when the user asks to think from first principles, challenge the fundamentals, or rebuild this from scratch. Also triggers on "why does it have to work this way", "what are the actual constraints here", "ignore what everyone else does", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a convention-break frame. Based on Aristotle's first principles method, popularised by Musk and Feynman. Produces genuinely novel solutions by eliminating convention.