Packs
3 packs@brycewang-stanford
Science Skills
Twelve-skill bundle covering the Science manuscript lifecycle: workflow router, scope/significance fit, advance framing, abstract + one-sentence summary, main-text writing, display items, statistics & reproducibility, data/materials/code availability, reference style, cover letter, submission preflight, and reviewer rebuttal.
2 skills · pack
@brycewang-stanford
NEJM Skills
Twelve-skill bundle covering the NEJM clinical manuscript lifecycle: workflow router, clinical-significance fit, study design & trial registration, EQUATOR reporting guidelines, structured abstract, terse IMRAD writing, clinical statistics, clinical display items, clinical ethics & integrity, Vancouver/ICMJE references, submission preflight, and response to reviewers.
7 skills · pack
@brycewang-stanford
Cell Skills
Twelve-skill bundle covering the Cell manuscript lifecycle: workflow router, scope/significance fit, single-narrative framing, the Highlights + eTOC + Graphical Abstract trio, the ≤150-word Summary, main-text writing, display items, STAR Methods + Key Resources Table, data/code availability, Cell Press author–date references, submission preflight + cover letter, and reviewer rebuttal.
9 skills · pack
Results for “manuscript-review”
21 skills
qhjqhj00 review
Routes quality reviews to specialized critic agents based on file type or flags, covering peer review, code review, and manuscript polish.
3 · bundle
k-dense-ai peer-review
Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals with structured, checklist-based peer review covering methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards.
30.2k · bundle
chen-yu-hao peer-review
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
5 · bundle
More results
onourimpram peer-review-confidentiality-protocol
Use when serving as a peer reviewer and deciding whether and how AI may assist, when a manuscript under review must never be pasted into an external tool, or when a confidentiality-preserving review and disclosure are needed.
2
onourimpram journal-fit-screening
Use when choosing a journal for a finished or nearly finished manuscript, when index status in Scopus, SSCI, ESCI, or TR Dizin must be confirmed, when a venue looks predatory, or when a cover letter needs drafting from the manuscript's actual claims.
2
pablolion bmad-editorial-review-prose
Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose
12
samyakjhaveri paper-review-sim
Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.
0
construct-ai-primary requesting-code-review
Requesting Code Review
0 · bundle
salacoste bmad-editorial-review-prose
Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose
1
racecraft-lab speckit-review-run
Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.
11
brycewang-stanford nejm-rebuttal
Use after NEJM reviews arrive — often including a dedicated statistical reviewer and an editor letter — to triage the decision, answer statistical comments rigorously, and draft a point-by-point response that quotes each comment, the response, and the revised manuscript text. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.
1k
salacoste bmad-editorial-review-structure
Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure
1
delorenj bmad-editorial-review-prose
Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose
1
mesteriis supply-chain-review
Reviews lockfiles, installers, provenance, CI permissions, dependency confusion, artifacts, registries, and publishing.
0 · bundle
obra requesting-code-review
Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade, with precisely crafted context for evaluation.
247k · bundle
pablolion bmad-editorial-review-structure
Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure
12
livelybug plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. (gstack)
0
testdouble spike-guidance-adversarial
Readability Review
218
projectious-work pk-review
Review the current branch's changes against the project's code style and
0
onourimpram rebuttal-traceability-matrix
Use when reviewer comments arrive and each one needs a tracked decision, when a revise and resubmit letter must map every comment to a manuscript change, or when contradictory reviewer demands need evidence-based, editor-facing framing.
2
brycewang-stanford deslop
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use this skill when writing, drafting, editing, reviewing, or revising any text to eliminate predictable AI tells, slop, and formulaic patterns. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to "deslop", "de-AI", "make it sound human," "remove AI patterns," "remove AI tropes," "clean up AI writing," fix "slop," "deslop" text, or review prose for authenticity. Also use when the user asks you to write or draft anything and wants it to sound natural rather than AI-generated. Common use cases include scientific writing (manuscripts, abstracts, cover letters, grant narratives, discussion sections, peer review responses), blog posts, newsletters, memos, reports, and any other substantial prose.
1k · bundle