Results for “prospects”

Drafts SEC-compliant prospectuses for U.S. securities offerings (IPOs, follow-ons, private placements). Structures cover page, risk factors, use of proceeds, business description, MD&A, financials, and offering terms against uploaded company documents and EDGAR comparables. Use when preparing a Form S-1, S-11, offering circular, or any primary disclosure document for a public or private issuance.

Use when making a forward-looking claim with a checkable outcome (reply within 24h, error rate will drop, this skill will see more use) — record to state/predictions.jsonl with a review horizon so reflection can grade you later. Closes the in-the-moment double-loop.

当意识到当前行为模式可能导致不理想的未来，需要一种具体方法来激发改变动力时

Draft outcome-led value proposition hooks for a target agency or pursuit using vault context and mission alignment. Use when user asks for messaging angles for capture — catalog skill from coreyhaines marketingskills pattern.

Price-to-win lens using GSA CALC+, BLS OEWS, and incumbent USASpending award patterns for a pursuit. Use when user asks for realism checks or competitive pricing posture before proposal — draft skill, not production-verified.

Track key contacts who change jobs and draft warm outreach to movers at ICP companies

Structure spoken product-sense interview answers with assumptions, segmentation, pain-point prioritization, and MVP tradeoffs.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. (gstack)

Run a pre-mortem — imagine the project has already failed one year from now and work backward to find the root causes before they happen. Load when the user asks for a pre-mortem, wants to imagine failure before committing, asks "what could go wrong before we start", "assume this fails — why", "risk analysis before launch", "what kills this project", "what could go wrong", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a pre-mortem frame. Based on Gary Klein's prospective hindsight method, which surfaces failure causes more effectively than forward risk analysis. Most useful right before a major commitment.

Outreach triggered by funding events with post-funding needs analysis and personalized drafts

Run structured What-If scenario analysis with 4-6 branch possibility exploration (best, likely, worst, wild card, contrarian, second-order). Use for speculative questions about uncertain futures, strategic forks, contingency planning, or stress-testing decisions.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

Turn "which leads should I work?" into a lead-by-lead work plan. Per-lead status (never-touched, engaged-not-replied, gone-cold, hot), days-dark per lead, last-touch quality, a re-engagement ranker, and a recommended next action for every lead. Built for SDRs and full-cycle reps, customizable to your CRM and your outreach tool. Trigger on "which leads should I work?", "who haven't I touched?", "show me cold leads", "hot leads to follow up on", "who's gone dark?", "re-engagement candidates", or any lead-level work-assignment question.

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Drafts litigation-ready U.S. pre-suit demand letters that function as settlement instruments and defensible future exhibits. Enforces element-driven narratives, verified authority, damages methodology, and ethics guardrails. Use this skill when the user mentions demand letter, pre-suit demand, breach and cure notice, settlement demand, insurance policy-limits demand, Stowers demand, FDCPA collection letter, notice of intent to file, cease and desist demand for payment, or pre-litigation correspondence. Also trigger when the user asks about FRE 408 framing, contractual notice compliance, statutory pre-suit prerequisites, evidence preservation notices, or quantifying damages for a demand package. Skill includes 14 verified real-letter exemplars referenced from `references/ARCHETYPE-INDEX.md`.

Use this skill to explain to customers/sales prospects why FMCSA CSA scores are not available in real-time. Covers the SAFER refresh cycle and what 'real-time' actually means for CSA data.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a challenge funnel", "build a 5-day challenge", "bootcamp funnel", "challenge launch", or mentions challenges, bootcamps, or multi-day engagement funnels. Creates challenge funnels that activate prospects, build community, and convert to core offers.