Results for “quality-checklist”

Audits Claude skills and commands for quality, offering Quick Scan for changed skills and Full Stocktake modes with sequential subagent batch evaluation.

Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.

Self-contained code review checklist — formatting, type safety, duplication, readable conditions, logic-out-of-UI, test coverage, comment quality. Adapts to whatever tooling the project actually has (skips Prettier/TypeScript/test-runner checks if unconfigured). Use before merging, after completing a feature, or any time you want a second pass on code quality. In Claude Code, prefer the official `code-review` skill or `pr-review-toolkit`/`feature-dev` code-reviewer agents instead — both are real, installed, and go deeper than this checklist. This copy exists for Codex/Cursor portability, where those agents aren't available.

Create systematic QA checklists to verify that design implementations match specifications across visual accuracy, layout, interaction, content, accessibility, and cross-platform categories.

Quality Gates

Review local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues using a structured checklist-driven process.

Build a launch checklist with owners, dates, dependencies, decision gates, and follow-through.

Runs a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase, deriving behavioral requirements, generating spec-traced tests, performing multi-pass code review, and producing a consolidated bug report with verified patches.

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues using a structured checklist and attack surface mapping.

Ai Content Qa

Create punch lists for construction completion inspection. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with punch-list related tasks.

5 维度质量评审和 Anti-Slop 检测框架，用于确保设计产出达到品牌级水准。 包含评审标准、检测清单、评分规则和修复建议模板。 触发词：质量审查、评审、Anti-Slop、检测、评分、门控

Measures code quality, identifies code smells, and implements quality gates using static analysis and technical debt tracking.

Create punch lists for construction completion inspection. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with punch-list related tasks.

General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.

Review pull requests against repository standards using automated validation and manual content review.

Skill Tester

Review MATLAB code for quality, performance, maintainability, and adherence to MathWorks coding standards. Uses check_matlab_code and matlab_coding_guidelines. Use when reviewing code, checking style, finding code smells, assessing quality, or preparing code for handoff or publication.

Runs a multi-phase verification pipeline including build, type-check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review to ensure code quality before creating a PR.

Combined verification — recite (description quality via cold-read prediction) + validate (schema compliance) + review (health checks). Use as a quality gate after creating notes or as periodic maintenance. Triggers on "/verify", "/verify [note]", "verify note quality", "check note health".

Comprehensive checklist for documenting follow-up work and testing needs after implementation

Provides a structured code review checklist covering security, performance, correctness, maintainability, testing, accessibility, and documentation, with a three-pass review process and guidance on severity levels and anti-patterns.

Provides a comprehensive checklist for designing REST and GraphQL APIs, covering resource design, HTTP methods, status codes, pagination, security, performance, and documentation.

Test quality inspection framework for reviewing test coverage, identifying gaps, and ensuring comprehensive validation

Brainstorm a longlist of benefits and costs for a project. Outputs two clean tables (benefits and costs), each with materiality (H/M/L), a cash flow tag (cash in / cash out / non-cash), a quantification method, and a monetisation method. Supports HMT Green Book, EU Better Regulation Guidelines, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Victorian Treasury High Value High Risk (HVHR) framework.

Analyzes evaluation patterns across completed plans and evolves the superpowers checklists accordingly.

Guides contributors through creating pull requests that add or fix skills, with a checklist covering metadata validation, risk labeling, and security disclaimers.

Reviews local branch changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues, using a structured checklist and verification process.

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.