Results for “questioning”

Guides junior developers and AI newcomers through Socratic questioning to build autonomy and reasoning skills, never providing direct answers.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Runs a relentless interview that sharpens a plan or design. Use when the user wants to be grilled on an idea, pressure-test a plan, or refine a design through questioning.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Clarifies ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Stress-test a plan or design by interviewing the user relentlessly about every aspect until reaching a shared understanding.

Turns a decision the user can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in. Use when the user says "turn this into a questionnaire" or needs knowledge pulled out of an expert.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea — one question at a time — until shared understanding is reached. Use when the user says "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "interview me about this", "poke holes in this", "challenge my thinking", or before committing to a non-trivial design.

Runs an interactive QA session, clarifying user-reported problems, exploring the codebase for context, and filing durable, user-focused GitHub issues.

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Grilling

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

Runs a relentless interview that asks every frontier question at once, round by round. Use when the user wants to be grilled on a design or map a design tree.

Deliberative consultation with Gemini CLI. Ask, evaluate, critique, iterate until workable agreement.

对 wiki 提问，综合检索相关页面后回答，好的回答可 crystallize 回 wiki

Deliberative consultation with Codex CLI. Ask, evaluate, critique, iterate until workable agreement.

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

Socratic coach for breaking down problems to fundamental truths. Use when users want to think through a problem deeply, challenge assumptions, or find innovative solutions. Triggers on requests like "help me think through this", "let's break this down", "what are my blind spots", "I'm stuck on a problem", "challenge my assumptions", or explicit requests for first-principles thinking.

Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). (gstack)

Ask a local external advisor CLI (Claude or Gemini) and capture a reusable artifact

Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required. Use when asked to "tune questions", "stop asking me that", "too many questions", "show my profile", "what questions have I been asked", "show my vibe", "developer profile", or "turn off question tuning". (gstack) Proactively suggest when the user says the same gstack question has come up before, or when they explicitly override a recommendation for the Nth time.

Put the user in the hot seat — one question at a time until their plan, decision, or idea actually holds up. Use whenever the user says "hot seat me", "grill me", "stress-test this", "poke holes in this", "am I missing anything", or drops a plan and wants it challenged before anyone acts on it — even if they never say the words. Also used as a sub-procedure by the whiteboard and connotation-cop skills.

Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.

Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity gating before explicit execution approval

Advises against testosterone therapy in men with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer treatment due to very limited data and potential risk of progression. Consider when a patient has a rising PSA after definitive therapy and the clinician evaluates testosterone for hypogonadism, questioning whether TTh is safe in BCR.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)