Results for “rationale”

Author a new docs-native canonical or working document by choosing the correct location, filename, viewpoint template, metadata header, stable claims, and embedded rationale without creating spec.md.

Understand through recursive decomposition and modular reconstruction of simple operations to reproduce emergent complexity. Use this skill whenever reasoning is required. Framework for [[#parse|parsing]], [[#branch|branching]], [[#reduce|reducing]], [[#ground|grounding]] and [[#emit|emitting]]. Employs metacognitive reasoning epistemology, leveraging first principles through recursive decomposition[^1]. Self-referential and scale-invariant.

Record buy rationale and structured sell conditions for stock positions, with automatic monitoring to detect when exit triggers fire.

Mines a codebase for evidence-backed improvement opportunities, forcing two escalation gates to surface breakthrough ideas, and outputs a ranked portfolio with a plan seed without implementing.

Provides a structured reasoning protocol for diagnosing complex relationships, organizations, institutions, public disputes, or long-term evolution using the CrossFrame framework, with explicit invocation required.

Explain any concept in plain words with one concrete analogy - clear enough for a smart child or a busy outsider, never condescending, never wrong.

当个人感到迷茫，不确定自己真正想要什么，或发现当前追求无法带来深层满足时，调用此模型来探索和澄清内在真实欲望

Find root causes of bugs, test failures, or unexpected behavior before proposing any fixes.

Temporal interval algebra for reasoning about time relationships in planning and knowledge representation

Universal transformation λ(ο,K).τ with recursive self-improvement. USE WHEN routing reasoning, validating knowledge graphs, preparing CICM/ANZCA examinations, or when self-improvement of reasoning/architecture/context is required. Routes queries through R0-R3 complexity pipelines, validates topology (η≥target) and governance (KROG), emits per style (Φ), and compounds learnings into knowledge K. Triggers on complexity assessment, multi-step reasoning, examination mode, or /λ invocation.

当寻求个人行动或项目在更宏大系统中的意义，或需要将日常工作与长远价值连接时

Guides systematic root-cause investigation before proposing fixes for any technical issue, with a four-phase process and red flags to avoid guessing.

当遇到令人情绪激动或陷入僵局的情境，需要跳出固有反应模式以做出更优决策时

Navigate moral reasoning from personal dilemmas to academic philosophy.

LLaVA-NeXT: Improved Reasoning, OCR, and World Knowledge

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

当面临信息过载或想法过多，需要筛选出值得投入资源（时间、精力）去执行的高价值想法时

Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

Legal-specific Argument Ranking Engine. Hodnotí právní argumenty 17-sloupcovým scoringem (síla, bezpečnost, dopad, riziko + 10 legal-specific kritérií: Compliance s novelou 2026, Evidence backing, Time-sensitivity, per-document mapping, R-static/R-reversal split, Tom-weight bonus, C-XX/M-XX/N-XX/D-XX integrace). Output: priorizovaný seznam argumentů s kategoriemi CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED/SUMMARY a per-document bundles (PR/§909/40_06/195). Použití: pre-prioritizace argumentů před F11.x review, Phase 2 Verify input, DÁVKA 3, výživné L04, AT podání. VŽDY použij tento skill, když Tom (nebo legal/strat) zmíní: /lare, lare, argument ranking, ARE matrix, score arguments, prioritize arguments, argument bundle, CORE/SUPPORT/CONTEXT/EXCLUDED, ARE_F11, LARE_F11, legal argument evaluation, argument scoring, compliance scoring, Tom-weight.

Synthesize retrospectives into themes, root causes, decisions, and team improvements.

Guides a structured root-cause investigation before any fix, covering reproduction, evidence gathering, hypothesis testing, and implementation with failing tests.

The instruction to profile before optimizing survives because intuition about

当需要在写作中与读者建立情感连接、放大问题严重性，并引出后续解决方案时

当需要将生活或工作中的复杂情境转化为可管理、可执行的系统时，或当感到迷茫、缺乏动力、陷入社会比较时，调用此模型来重新构建认知和行动框架

Craft clear, empathetic end-of-life announcements for products, features, or plans, including rationale, customer impact, and transition support.

Record decisions with rationale, alternatives, and consequences — the ADR pattern as a primitive. Use when a consequential choice is made — architecture, tooling, process, scope, trade-off. Capture WHY, not just WHAT.

Inspects a skill's SKILL.md and its observations/runs.md log, identifies failure patterns, and proposes a targeted amendment to improve the skill. Trigger on: "improve this skill", "fix this skill", "update this skill", "why does X keep failing", "this skill is wrong", "add this to the skill", or automatically when observations/<skill-name>/runs.md contains 3 or more failure entries. Outputs the amendment as a diff the user can review before applying. Records the amendment rationale in observations/<skill-name>/runs.md after user confirmation.

Turn "is this account a real fit?" into a stacked verdict. A composite 0-100 fit score built from every signal you have, a breakdown by source, override flags for when a scoring tool is wrong, a channel classification, and a written rationale. Built for reps, marketers, and RevOps, customizable to your CRM and whatever scoring you use. Trigger on "is {account} a real fit?", "score this list against our profile", "find lookalikes to our best customers", "why is the score wrong on {account}?", "validate this prospect list", "what's our coverage in {segment}?", or any account or list qualification.