Results for “reasoning”

Universal transformation λ(ο,K).τ with recursive self-improvement. USE WHEN routing reasoning, validating knowledge graphs, preparing CICM/ANZCA examinations, or when self-improvement of reasoning/architecture/context is required. Routes queries through R0-R3 complexity pipelines, validates topology (η≥target) and governance (KROG), emits per style (Φ), and compounds learnings into knowledge K. Triggers on complexity assessment, multi-step reasoning, examination mode, or /λ invocation.

Temporal interval algebra for reasoning about time relationships in planning and knowledge representation

Understand through recursive decomposition and modular reconstruction of simple operations to reproduce emergent complexity. Use this skill whenever reasoning is required. Framework for [[#parse|parsing]], [[#branch|branching]], [[#reduce|reducing]], [[#ground|grounding]] and [[#emit|emitting]]. Employs metacognitive reasoning epistemology, leveraging first principles through recursive decomposition[^1]. Self-referential and scale-invariant.

SONA self-optimizing neural architecture with ReasoningBank trajectory learning, EWC++ anti-forgetting, and reinforcement learning feedback loops.

Applies TRIZ cross-domain analogical reasoning to find solutions from adjacent fields. Use when stuck on a problem and needing inventive perspectives.

Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.

Multi-dimensional lead qualification scoring. Evaluates leads against BANT criteria, firmographic fit, behavioral signals, and intent indicators. Outputs qualified/disqualified verdict with detailed reasoning.

Guides junior developers and AI newcomers through Socratic questioning to build autonomy and reasoning skills, never providing direct answers.

Get a second opinion from Claude Code. Use from Codex when you want to cross-check your reasoning, validate a plan, or get an independent review from Claude.

Generates high-fidelity images using reasoning-driven prompts and structured creative briefs via muapi.ai.

Simulates Elon Musk with psychological depth and high-fidelity communication, applying first principles thinking, physics-based reasoning, characteristic humor, and authentic controversial opinions.

Write clear design rationale that connects decisions to user needs, business goals, and principles.

Explains how Agent Script instruction resolution works across three phases, with patterns for pre-LLM setup, LLM reasoning, and post-action loops.

Analyzes code for logical errors, race conditions, security vulnerabilities, and algorithmic flaws using structured reasoning across 9 risk categories.

Apag Advantage Framing

Analyze complex systems through stocks, flows, and feedback loops to find high-leverage interventions. For organizational, environmental, social, and technical systems exhibiting circular causality. NOT for linear problems or simple cause-effect chains.

Provides a rigorous thinking partner profile that challenges assumptions, calibrates claims to evidence, and improves decision quality under uncertainty.

Think like a human. Reason, plan, adapt, create, and know your limits.

Guides systematic root-cause investigation before proposing fixes for any technical issue, with a four-phase process and red flags to avoid guessing.

Explain any concept in plain words with one concrete analogy - clear enough for a smart child or a busy outsider, never condescending, never wrong.

当寻求个人行动或项目在更宏大系统中的意义，或需要将日常工作与长远价值连接时

Police the project's vocabulary — bust vague terms, keep the CONTEXT.md glossary sharp, and lock in decisions worth remembering as ADRs. Use when the user debates naming, says "what should we call this", asks to pin down terminology, wants a decision recorded, or when another skill (hot-seat, whiteboard) surfaces a decision that clears the ADR bar. Just reading the glossary for vocabulary is NOT this skill — trigger only when the words or decisions are being changed.

Think through any legal situation like a lawyer. Issue spotting, jurisdiction, risk assessment, actionable conclusions.

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

Find root causes of bugs, test failures, or unexpected behavior before proposing any fixes.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

The instruction to profile before optimizing survives because intuition about

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

Socratic coach for breaking down problems to fundamental truths. Use when users want to think through a problem deeply, challenge assumptions, or find innovative solutions. Triggers on requests like "help me think through this", "let's break this down", "what are my blind spots", "I'm stuck on a problem", "challenge my assumptions", or explicit requests for first-principles thinking.

Evidence-driven tracing lane that orchestrates competing tracer hypotheses in Claude built-in team mode