Results for “result-interpretation”

Provides expert guidance for systematic backtesting of trading strategies, covering methodology, stress testing, bias prevention, and result interpretation.

Analyze ML experiment results, compute statistics, generate comparison tables and insights. Use when user says "analyze results", "compare", or needs to interpret experimental data.

Transforms A/B test and product experiment data into actionable readouts with hypothesis, metrics, interpretation, and decision.

整合智能体输出结果为结构化最终输出，支持多种格式。适用于整合分析报告、生成结构化报告

整合多情点分析结果为综合报告，通过去重、分类、排序、总结生成高质量分析。适用于整合多分析源、生成统一报告

Use this skill when interpreting a drug test result that comes back as 'diluted negative,' 'diluted positive,' 'refusal,' or 'adulterated.' Covers what constitutes a refusal vs. retest vs. confirmed positive.

Post-epic review to extract lessons and assess success. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]"

Think through the consequences of consequences — not just what happens immediately, but what happens next, and next after that, across time. Load when a decision looks obviously good or obviously bad on initial read, when the user is optimising for a short-term outcome that might create a long-term problem, when unintended consequences are a concern, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a second-order frame. Triggers on "what are the downstream effects", "what happens after that", "unintended consequences", "think ahead on this", "long-term vs short-term", or "what comes after that". Based on Howard Marks second-level thinking and Farnam Street mental models. Most powerful for decisions with delayed consequences or systemic effects.

Analyse experiment results, run validity checks (SRM, exposure parity, data integrity, novelty/primacy), interpret causally, make a ship/iterate/kill decision against the pre-declared rule, and append to cumulative learnings. Forces honest readouts — strips significance claims from underpowered or peek-violating tests; never lets directional results masquerade as causal wins. Load when results exist, or when the user says "read out this experiment", "analyse the test", "did the test win", "interpret the results", "what did we learn", "ship or kill", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

Outcome Eval

Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity gating before explicit execution approval

当需要在写作中与读者建立情感连接、放大问题严重性，并引出后续解决方案时

Universal transformation λ(ο,K).τ with recursive self-improvement. USE WHEN routing reasoning, validating knowledge graphs, preparing CICM/ANZCA examinations, or when self-improvement of reasoning/architecture/context is required. Routes queries through R0-R3 complexity pipelines, validates topology (η≥target) and governance (KROG), emits per style (Φ), and compounds learnings into knowledge K. Triggers on complexity assessment, multi-step reasoning, examination mode, or /λ invocation.

Use when making a forward-looking claim with a checkable outcome (reply within 24h, error rate will drop, this skill will see more use) — record to state/predictions.jsonl with a review horizon so reflection can grade you later. Closes the in-the-moment double-loop.

smart-output

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Evidence-driven tracing lane that orchestrates competing tracer hypotheses in Claude built-in team mode

Analyzes why a piece of content resonates with audiences using five classic communication theories, identifies the emotional core and effective stance, and outputs discussion directions for a chatroom.

Translate text faithfully into a target language while preserving meaning, register, and intent.

当遭遇挫折、失败或结果不如预期时，用于将负面经验转化为成长燃料

Use when adapting academic findings for a public audience (op-ed, social post, podcast) and the simplification must stay evidence-faithful, avoid overclaiming, respect embargoes, and disclose AI assistance.

Use when drafting or revising the body sections of an AER, AER:Insights, or AEJ manuscript — institutional background, data, empirical strategy, results, mechanisms, and conclusion. Covers equation conventions, results-paragraph narration, magnitude interpretation, and back-of-envelope policy calculations. Apply after the empirics are stable and before or alongside aer-introduction.

Determines unilateral vs bilateral aldosterone excess based on cortisol-corrected aldosterone ratios from adrenal venous sampling, with ratio >4:1 indicating unilateral excess, ratio 3:1 suggestive of bilateral hypersecretion, and interpretation dependent on cosyntropin stimulation protocol used during sampling. Use when analyzing AVS results to guide surgical vs medical treatment decisions; triggers include 'AVS lateralization ratio', 'cosyntropin-stimulated AVS', 'aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio >4:1', and 'ratio 3:1 suggestive of bilateral disease'.