Results for “risk-review”

Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.

Reviews and repairs risky or unclear code with minimal validated changes, running a fixed-point loop until the diff is clean across two consecutive review cycles.

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.

Maintain a RAID log tracking risks, assumptions, issues, and dependencies with owners and review cadence.

Reviews code through the lens of 12 classic software engineering books, catching design smells, coupling issues, and architectural risks that linters miss.

Maps domains, ownership, dependencies, entry points, tests, services, and risks before broad changes, review, migration, or handoff.

Runs three parallel reviewers to find code reuse, quality, and efficiency issues in a diff, then applies safe fixes and reports risky ones.

Launches four parallel read-only sub-agents to review a git diff or file scope for regressions, security risks, performance issues, and contract gaps, then aggregates findings into a prioritized fix path.

AI code reviewer grounded in classic software engineering books for catching design smells, coupling issues, and architectural risks.

Structures a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Use to build an account's cumulative support record ahead of a renewal or QBR, so the review reflects the whole relationship rather than the most recent ticket. Trigger for "prepare for this renewal", "what has this account's support experience been", "which accounts are at risk before renewal", QBR preparation, account health review, or an account that renewed badly with no warning.

Audits Rust codebases for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes.

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs), adapting analysis depth to codebase size and generating comprehensive markdown reports.

Analyzes .NET project code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify risk hotspots, methods blocking coverage gains, and prioritize where to add tests.

Broad risk assessment — key-person, technical, regulatory, competitive, financial, and execution risks beyond product/market

Use when evaluating potential risks before making decisions, starting initiatives, or implementing changes. This skill provides a structured risk assessment framework for identifying, analyzing, and responding to risks across all domains.

任意のリポジトリ（アプリ/ライブラリ/運用スクリプト/コンテンツ等）の種別を判定し、 種別に応じた評価軸（品質・テスト・依存、または検証ゲート等）で**実測ベース**評価して優先度付き改善案を出すスキル。 言語非依存（Python は AST 詳細・その他は近似と明記）。ベンダーコード混入・除外の空振り・偽の成功終了コードなど、 「黙って間違った数値を出す」失敗を構造的に封じる。 「リポジトリレビューして」「コード品質を評価して」「このプロジェクトを診断して」「包括レビュー」「repo-review」 「アーキテクチャ評価して」等で発火。/repo-review でも起動。

Identify and prioritize risks by impact and controllability. Use for risk management, project planning, and strategic decision support.

Internal architecture and change-impact review assistant for this repository.

Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.

Reviews lockfiles, installers, provenance, CI permissions, dependency confusion, artifacts, registries, and publishing.

Reviews secrets, config defaults, environment variables, logs, credentials, CI secrets, and unsafe settings.

Routes quality reviews to specialized critic agents based on file type or flags, covering peer review, code review, and manuscript polish.

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Evaluates a local pre-trade checklist before manual order entry, blocking planless, oversized, revenge-risk, market-regime-blocked, or circuit-breaker-blocked entries while journaling the decision for later review.

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Comprehensive legal document review specialist for contracts, litigation documents, and real estate agreements — summarizing documents, flagging risk clauses, comparing contract versions, and checking compliance across any law firm size or practice area

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

Diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite—brittleness, mock overuse, and other decay risks—drawing on twelve classic engineering books including xUnit Test Patterns and Working Effectively with Legacy Code.