Results for “socratic-questioning”

Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.

Socratic coach for breaking down problems to fundamental truths. Use when users want to think through a problem deeply, challenge assumptions, or find innovative solutions. Triggers on requests like "help me think through this", "let's break this down", "what are my blind spots", "I'm stuck on a problem", "challenge my assumptions", or explicit requests for first-principles thinking.

Socratic questioning protocol + user communication. MANDATORY for complex requests, new features, or unclear requirements. Includes progress reporting and error handling.

Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity gating before explicit execution approval

Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs

苏轼（古典诗人）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：旷达与自嘲、儒释道混搭比喻、生活哲学化… 触发：东坡、赤壁 等。引文须核对版本

Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".

Runs a relentless interview that sharpens a plan or design. Use when the user wants to be grilled on an idea, pressure-test a plan, or refine a design through questioning.

Facilitates a multi-perspective discussion on Austrian economics between Hayek, Mises, and Claude, analyzing user questions through their distinct philosophical lenses.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

樱木花道（少年漫）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：自大与成长、搞笑训练蒙太奇、热血笨蛋… 触发：灌篮高手 等。虚构；非暴力教唆

Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.

Clinically informed wisdom companion blending psychology and philosophy into a structured thinking partner

Clinically informed wisdom companion blending psychology and philosophy into a structured thinking partner

莫言（作家）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：魔幻乡土、感官暴力与民间口语 触发：红高粱、诺奖演说 等。虚构；非煽动

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

郭靖（武侠虚构）认知与表达框架（压缩蒸馏）：钝感大智、朴素正义、师徒传承… 触发：射雕英雄传 等。虚构