Results for “thinkst”

Deploys canary files, honeypot shares, and decoy systems to detect ransomware activity at the earliest possible stage.

基于 anchor 论文、topic 关键词或当前 wiki 状态，产出一份排好序的候选论文 shortlist，供用户或上游 skill 决定是否进一步 `/ingest`。当用户问 "接下来该读什么"、"找和这篇相似的论文"、"推荐相关工作"、"这个方向周围有什么" 时触发；`/ingest --discover` 也会内部调用本 skill。本身不 ingest，只提出候选。

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

pytest Python testing framework. Covers fixtures, parametrize, and mocking. Use for Python testing. USE WHEN: user mentions "pytest", "python test", "fixture", asks about "@pytest.fixture", "@pytest.mark.parametrize", "conftest.py", "pytest coverage", "python unit test" DO NOT USE FOR: JavaScript/TypeScript - use `vitest` or `jest`; Java - use `junit`; E2E web tests - use `playwright`; Load testing - use locust

CEO/founder-mode plan review. (gstack)

Structured brainstorming for projects and features. Explores multiple options before implementation.

Build serverless background jobs, event-driven workflows, and durable execution with Inngest, without managing queues or workers.

Manage tasks and projects in Todoist. Use when user asks about tasks, to-dos, reminders, or productivity.

Turns rough ideas into approved, decision-complete plans with validated structure before coding. Use when users ask in any language for planning, architecture, design direction, feasibility, value judgment, or whether a feature is worth doing before implementation. Not for bug fixes or small edits.

Write and run unit tests with Vitest, a Vite-native testing framework offering Jest-compatible API, mocking, coverage, and snapshot testing.

Simulates a multi-perspective deliberation council to explore complex questions, decisions, or creative challenges from diverse thinking archetypes.

Pressure-test any business idea with a five-angle adversarial panel (Critic, Champion, Analyst, Investigator, Customer) that returns a single GO/RESHAPE/KILL verdict with the cheapest test to de-risk it.

Provides full-stack development practices covering backend architecture, frontend-backend integration, and production hardening with structured workflows and checklists.

Use when someone asks to roast an idea, pressure-test or stress-test an idea, validate a business idea, "convene the panel", get a brutal second opinion before building something, or says "/roast".

Build reliable background processing and durable, long-running workflows using Inngest without managing infrastructure.

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

Brainstorm a longlist of benefits and costs for a project. Outputs two clean tables (benefits and costs), each with materiality (H/M/L), a cash flow tag (cash in / cash out / non-cash), a quantification method, and a monetisation method. Supports HMT Green Book, EU Better Regulation Guidelines, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the Victorian Treasury High Value High Risk (HVHR) framework.

Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.

Deploys deception technology including honeypots, honeytokens, and decoy systems to detect attackers who have bypassed perimeter defenses, providing high-fidelity alerts with near-zero false positive rates.