Results for “critic”

Analyze the spatial and structural qualities of a screen design, evaluating balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt principles to identify compositional weaknesses and propose specific fixes.

Audits colour decisions on a screen for contrast ratios, palette coherence, semantic meaning, and accessibility, flagging deviations and recommending specific corrections.

Audits typographic decisions on a screen for scale usage, readability, consistency, and token compliance, providing specific fixes.

Analyze a screen's interactive affordances to identify clickability issues, state visibility gaps, CTA clarity problems, and action discoverability failures.

Facilitate structured design critiques with clear feedback frameworks and actionable outcomes.

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Get structured design feedback on usability, hierarchy, and consistency. Trigger with "review this design", "critique this mockup", "what do you think of this screen?", or when sharing a Figma link or screenshot for feedback at any stage from exploration to final polish. If the user asks specifically about accessibility, use `accessibility-review` instead.

Analyze a screen's visual hierarchy by evaluating entry point, eye flow, weight distribution, and emphasis, then provide actionable fixes.

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy, flagging issues with easing, duration, performance, and accessibility.