Results for “pr-draft”

Full-novel craft + anti-slop pipeline with project mode (ledger, characters, foreshadow, worldbuilding bible), draft→review→revise gates, and stability-trap enforcement at scene/chapter/manuscript scale. Single-scene mode retained. Use for fiction, lore, character docs, dialogue, worldbuilding, or book projects.

Use when an ethics committee or IRB application involves AI anywhere in the pipeline, when KVKK, GDPR, or EU AI Act duties must be mapped to a study, or when consent and disclosure language about AI use needs drafting before submission.

Creates a GitHub pull request with an auto-generated summary, running mandatory pre-commit and code-quality review gates, plus optional deep-review subagents, and posts findings into the PR body.

Build the proof-of-concept automation that backs a freelance bid — turns a drafted gig's solution shape into a real, validated n8n workflow via the n8n Cloud MCP (SDK flow), publishes it, and writes the live workflow URL back onto the gig's Notion row. The Prove phase of the Inbound Gig Engine.

Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.

Produces durable, structured documentation in codebases with sparse docs — readable by humans and agents alike. Two invocation modes — `survey` proposes a doc plan; `draft` writes one specific doc end-to-end with a factcheck-then-persona review gate. Triggered by phrases like "doxcavate this repo", "doxcavate the X", "doxcavate `runbook-deploy`", "what should be documented?", "document this code", "write a how-it-works for X", or any request to inventory or write project documentation.

Federal acquisition compliance auditor for the active Theseus workspace, backed by live FAR/DFARS text via the vendored `ecfr` MCP. USE WHEN the user asks to audit FAR/DFARS clause coverage, validate that cited clauses actually exist in eCFR (catch fabricated or typo'd numbers), check whether a cited clause has been amended since the solicitation issued, validate regulatory references (NIST SP, DAFI, MIL-STD), check that every "shall" requirement has a deliverable, find missing compliance artifacts, audit proposal_instruction ↔ evaluation_factor coverage (UCF Section L↔M or non-UCF equivalent — FAR 16 task orders, FOPRs, BPA calls, OTAs), or "are we compliant with the proposal instructions?". Cross-references the workspace's clause / regulatory_reference / requirement / deliverable / compliance_artifact entities against live eCFR and flags gaps with severity. Format-agnostic. DO NOT USE FOR drafting compliant prose (use proposal-generator) or extracting clauses (Theseus pipeline does that automatically).