Results for “reviews”

Delegate coding tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI, covering headless and interactive modes, PR reviews, and session management.

Runs a structured bug-fix pipeline: scouts evidence, diagnoses root cause, applies minimal fixes, and reviews before committing.

Writes and reviews defensive Bash scripts for automation, CI/CD, and system utilities, emphasizing safety, portability, and testability.

Writes and reviews defensive Bash scripts for automation, CI/CD, and system utilities, emphasizing safety, portability, and testability.

Diagnoses AWS architecture issues and reviews Well-Architected pillars using read-only AWS CLI commands, with confirmation required for any changes.

Reviews and authors Cloudflare Workers code against production best practices, covering configuration, request handling, architecture, observability, code patterns, and security.

Creates, reviews, debugs, and modernizes Python project structure with deterministic tooling including pyproject.toml, uv, Ruff, Pyright, and pytest.

Reviews AWS infrastructure as code and deployed resources against the Well-Architected Framework, generating findings and GitHub issues for remediation.

Generates, reviews, fixes, and migrates Playwright end-to-end tests, with templates, agents, and integrations for TestRail and BrowserStack.

Reviews trading strategy drafts for edge plausibility, overfitting risk, sample size adequacy, and execution realism, outputting PASS/REVISE/REJECT verdicts with confidence scores.

Manage AWS cloud optimization and cost savings with nOps, including ShareSave analysis, commitment management, well-architected reviews, idle resource detection, and cost dashboards.

Reviews all pipeline artifacts from a virtual software team and produces quality, compliance, and sign-off reports with an advisory release verdict.

Reviews and hardens GitHub Actions workflows against injection, privilege escalation, supply-chain, and token-scoping risks that pattern matchers miss.

Finds the open GitHub PR for the current branch and helps address review comments using the gh CLI.

Manages and analyzes incidents, post-incident reviews, and collaboration workflows in Allma via its REST API, covering incident discovery, timeline tracking, stakeholder communication, and retrospective analysis.

Coordinates a 13-agent team for rigorous academic research on any topic, supporting eight modes from quick briefs to systematic reviews with meta-analysis.

Runs entitlement review and access certification campaigns using SailPoint IdentityIQ, including manager certifications, targeted entitlement reviews, role-based access validation, SOD violation remediation, and automated revocation workflows.

Compute fully-loaded cost-to-serve per channel, channel ROI under cash/LTV/marginal lenses, and optimal channel mix subject to strategic constraints for quarterly channel reviews.

Design and apply Azure role-based access control with least privilege at the right scope. Use this skill when users ask about permissions, role assignments, access errors, or governance. Covers built-in roles, custom roles, managed identities, PIM, and access reviews per Well-Architected principles.

Find over-permissive RBAC roles and service-account token abuse paths in Kubernetes using kubectl auth can-i, rbac-police, kubectl-who-can, and rakkess during authorized cluster security reviews.

Systematic Review Pipeline Orchestrator - Coordinates systematic literature review automation Manages the complete 7-stage PRISMA 2020 pipeline from research question to RAG system Delegates to specialized agents (I1, I2, I3) while enforcing human checkpoints Use when: conducting systematic reviews, building knowledge repositories, PRISMA automation Triggers: systematic review, PRISMA, literature review automation

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance. Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP impact levels (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS), FedRAMP 20x, OSCAL, 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, FedRAMP readiness, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when asked to "auto review", "autoplan", "run all reviews", "review this plan automatically", or "make the decisions for me". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan file and wants to run the full review gauntlet without answering 15-30 intermediate questions. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "auto plan", "automatic review".

Run the full autonomous shipping pipeline end-to-end, hands-off with no check-ins: plan, implement, review and fix, commit, push a branch, open a PR, and watch CI to green. Use only when the user explicitly asks to build or ship something autonomously all the way to an open PR, or invokes lfg directly — it pushes and opens a PR without stopping. Not for in-the-loop work where the user reviews each step: use ce-plan to plan, ce-work to implement a plan, ce-debug to fix a bug, or ce-commit-push-pr to commit and open a PR for existing changes.

>- Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my...