Results for “security-review”

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for exploitable vulnerabilities with concrete attack scenarios.

Manage GitHub repositories: triage issues, review PRs, debug CI/CD, prepare releases, and monitor security alerts using the gh CLI.

Runs a multi-phase verification pipeline including build, type-check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review to ensure code quality before creating a PR.

Run Azure compliance and security audits using azqr and Key Vault expiration checks, covering best-practice assessment, resource review, and security posture validation.

Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance for code, infrastructure, and cloud environments.

Systematically audits a web application against the OWASP 2021 Top 10, producing severity-rated, file-level findings with fixes for each category.

Manage GitHub repositories via the gh CLI: triage issues, review PRs, debug CI failures, create releases, and monitor security alerts.

Manages GitHub repositories via the gh CLI: triaging issues, reviewing PRs, debugging CI failures, preparing releases, and monitoring security alerts.

Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist by setting review goals, running static analysis, increasing test coverage, removing dead code, and generating documentation.

Performs a white-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0, mapping attack surfaces, tracing data flows, and chaining into downstream penetration testing and threat modeling skills.

Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.

Performs a comprehensive cross-artifact QA/QC review of a virtual team pipeline, checking completeness, consistency, security, and compliance, then issues an advisory verdict with quality, compliance, and sign-off reports.

Find over-permissive RBAC roles and service-account token abuse paths in Kubernetes using kubectl auth can-i, rbac-police, kubectl-who-can, and rakkess during authorized cluster security reviews.

Authorized security assessment for cloud, container, and Kubernetes environments covering metadata SSRF, IAM misconfigurations, container escape paths, and cluster RBAC review.

Hybrid security auditor for OpenClaw skills, Claude/Codex skills, and app repos. Use when installing a new skill, auditing a repo before use or deploy, reviewing custom scripts, checking for prompt injection, command execution, data exfiltration, dependency risk, secrets exposure, or privilege escalation. Use as the default gatekeeper before installing any third-party skill.

Runs a comprehensive verification pipeline for Quarkus projects including build, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, native compilation, and diff review before PRs or releases.

Reviews and hardens GitHub Actions workflows against injection, privilege escalation, supply-chain, and token-scoping risks that pattern matchers miss.

Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices.

Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices.

Audits a codebase for production readiness using local evidence, scoring ship/block risk and listing concrete fixes without sending repo data to external services.

Audit serverless functions across AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and GCP Cloud Functions for overly permissive execution roles, insecure environment variables, injection vulnerabilities, and missing runtime protections.

Set up and manage Heroku AppLink org connections and JWT authorizations for Salesforce or Data Cloud. Use when the agent needs to provision the Heroku AppLink add-on, install the AppLink CLI plugin, inspect AppLink connection setup, review connection prerequisites or connection state, connect Salesforce orgs, create JWT authorizations, review trusted org connection security, or reason about environment mapping for AppLink connections on Heroku.

All-in-one fullstack dev engine. /aura: 46 modes (build/fix/clean/deploy/review/spec/lore/ax/experiment/payment/debug/qa/orchestrate/escalate+), 6-layer security with 32 hooks, tiered models (ZERO/ECO/PRO/MAX), 8 languages, 16 specialized agents, SPEC/EARS/TRUST5/XLOOP/RALF/Autopus absorbed. ~55% token savings.

Design and apply QA methodology for software teams: test strategy, regression testing, CI failure triage, test automation, quality gates and metrics, risk-based testing, exploratory testing, test design techniques, AI code quality gates (independent verification, acceptance-criteria testability review for agentic Spec-Driven Development), mutation-guided test hardening and review evidence (surviving mutants, weak assertions, diff-aware mutation testing), agentic eval design (dataset test design, judge-as-system-under-test, flaky-eval discipline), QA career levels (Senior/Staff/Principal), and SDET engineering (test infrastructure, gTAA, CI/CD integration). Do not use for root-cause debugging of production incidents, security implementation or threat modeling, or evaluation framework governance and statistical analysis — route those to systematic-debugging, secure-software-engineering, and agent-evals-and-observability respectively.

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance. Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP impact levels (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS), FedRAMP 20x, OSCAL, 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, FedRAMP readiness, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

Single entrypoint for taw-kit. User types `/taw <anything in VN or EN>` — this skill classifies the intent (BUILD / FIX / SHIP / MAINTAIN / ADVISOR) and loads the matching branch file to execute. Replaces the old one-command-per-task model (/taw-new, /taw-add, /taw-fix, /taw-deploy, /taw-security) with a single unified command. Supports dev workflows out of the box: test, upgrade, clean, perf, rollback, refactor, types, seed, review, stack-swap, status, and ADVISOR group (analyze, suggest, coverage, adversarial, scope-check) for opinionated review of existing code. User-visible strings match the user's input language (Vietnamese by default for VN users). Two modes: SAFE (default — clarify + approval, max 1 round-trip) and YOLO (skip gates, smart defaults — for demos/power users). YOLO triggers: prose contains `yolo`, `nhanh nha`, `lam luon`, `khoi hoi`, `auto`, or args start with `yolo`. Trigger phrases (EN + VN) — broad match so user can keep typing plain prose without re-invoking /taw every turn. Grouped by