Results for “dia”

Generates explanatory illustrations for Chinese in-depth articles using a fixed IP character library, following a structured method of cognitive anchor selection, metaphor creation, and anti-PPT self-check.

Conduct multi-round deep research on any GitHub Repo. Use when users request comprehensive analysis, timeline reconstruction, competitive analysis, or in-depth investigation of GitHub. Produces structured markdown reports with executive summaries, chronological timelines, metrics analysis, and Mermaid diagrams. Triggers on Github repository URL or open source projects.

Generate comprehensive clinical reports including case reports (CARE guidelines), diagnostic reports, clinical trial reports (ICH-E3, SAE, CSR), and patient documentation (SOAP, H&P, discharge summaries) with templates, regulatory compliance, and validation tools.

Use to set up or fix quality assurance for voice/phone support, including transcript-based and AI-graded call QA. Trigger for "QA our calls", "score phone conversations", call transcription accuracy for QA, diarisation or speaker attribution problems, word error rate, grading calls from transcripts, or adapting a chat/email QA scorecard to voice.

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

Run condition-based vault health diagnostics. 8 categories — schema compliance, orphan detection, link health, description quality, three-space boundaries, processing throughput, stale notes, MOC coherence. 3 modes — quick (schema+orphans+links), full (all 8), three-space (boundary violations only). Returns actionable FAIL/WARN/PASS report with specific fixes ranked by impact. Triggers on "/health", "check vault health", "maintenance report", "what needs fixing".

Generate knowledge schemas and ontologies from any input format. Extract semantic structures, relationships, and hierarchies. Output as Obsidian markdown with YAML frontmatter, wikilinks, tags, and mermaid diagrams, or export to semantic formats (JSON-LD, RDF, Neo4j Cypher, GraphQL). Supports fractal mode (strict hierarchical constraints) and free mode (flexible generation). Auto-activates for queries containing "schema", "ontology", "knowledge graph", "extract structure", or "generate outline".

Inspect, extract, OCR, create, merge, split, reorder, rotate, annotate, fill, redact, compress, secure, and verify PDF documents while preserving source files and visual fidelity. Use when working with one or more .pdf files; converting documents to or from PDF; extracting text, tables, images, metadata, forms, or page ranges; applying true redactions or signatures; diagnosing malformed, encrypted, scanned, or inaccessible PDFs; or validating that a PDF transformation preserved the intended content and layout.

Comprehensive exploratory data analysis with publication-quality descriptive tables, correlation matrices, distribution plots, and assumption testing. Generates a standalone EDA report with Table 1 (gtsummary/great_tables), correlation heatmap, distribution diagnostics, VIF for multicollinearity, and normality/homoscedasticity tests. All figures are APA-formatted and colorblind-safe. Use when the user says "exploratory analysis," "EDA," "descriptive statistics," "explore the data," "Table 1," "correlations," "distributions," or when /data-clean completes successfully. Triggers on "EDA," "descriptive," "Table 1," "explore," "correlations."

Roll up the health of a customer book or segment into moves, not colors. At-risk accounts, renewals due, expansion candidates, and the accounts quietly going dark, each with the one move it needs. Built for B2B customer success teams, customizable to your data and your book. Trigger on "how's my book", "customer health report", "which accounts in my book need attention", "what's up for renewal", "who's going quiet", or any book-health diagnostic.

Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions — use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.

Turn any markdown file into a publication-quality PDF. Proper 1in margins, intelligent page breaks, page numbers, cover pages, running headers, curly quotes and em dashes, clickable TOC, diagonal DRAFT watermark. Not a draft artifact — a finished artifact. Use when asked to "make a PDF", "export to PDF", "turn this markdown into a PDF", or "generate a document". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "make this a pdf", "make it a pdf", "export to pdf", "turn this into a pdf", "turn this markdown into a pdf", "generate a pdf", "make a pdf from", "pdf this markdown".

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.