Results for “pr-review”

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Turn engineering work into evidence-backed impact statements for performance reviews, self-reviews, promotion packets, and weekly updates by mining Copilot CLI session logs, git history, and GitHub PRs.

Reviews and tailors Product Manager resumes against 10 best practices including the XYZ+S formula, keyword optimization, and job-specific customization.

Runs a structured self-review checklist before committing substantial code changes, covering edge cases, error paths, test coverage, documentation, and code quality.

Guides systematic review of processing documentation for completeness against GDPR Articles 5, 13-14, 24, 28, and 30. Activate when auditing documentation or preparing for inspections. Keywords: documentation review, processing records, completeness, privacy notices, RoPA.

Install a local rebuttal workspace for academic papers with structured intake, reviewer analysis, and strategy planning to produce venue-compliant author responses.

Structure compelling design presentations for stakeholders, reviews, and showcases.

Reviews MDPR Markdown-to-presentation workflows with semantic hints, visual checks, and deterministic renderer boundaries.

Review documentation and prose for compliance with writing guidelines, checking style, voice, and tone against a fetched rule set.

Create, refresh, and rewrite PR titles and descriptions following Sentry conventions, focusing on reviewer-facing content that describes the full branch diff.

Diagnose and fix SwiftUI performance issues like slow rendering, janky scrolling, and high CPU/memory usage through code review and profiling guidance.

Reviews unverified wiki pages flagged as explored: false, presenting them for human confirmation, editing, skipping, or deletion, and updating their status accordingly.

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

Embed before/after screenshots and annotated images in pull request descriptions to help reviewers see visual changes without checking out the branch.

Produces academic papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, and clinical reports with LaTeX formatting and verified citations, using research-lookup and parallel-web skills.

Generates a curated supplementary reading list from any course syllabus using Consensus academic search, producing a professionally formatted .docx with recent peer-reviewed papers per course section.

Creates safety alert decks with hazard stripes, tiered cards, and policy code blocks for incident reviews and risk communication.

Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2 for HealthTech and MedTech companies.

Turn a PR, branch, commit, or git diff into an interactive visual recap with diagrams, file maps, API/schema summaries, annotated diffs, and focused review notes.

Facilitate structured post-incident reviews to identify root causes, document what worked and failed, and produce actionable recommendations to improve future incident response.

Provides nine skills for Nature-journal-family academic publishing, covering figure creation, prose polishing, manuscript writing, citation formatting, data availability statements, paper reading, reviewer responses, paper-to-PPT conversion, and academic search via an MCP server.

Read, create, and edit DOCX files with professional formatting, including visual layout review via PDF rendering.

Prepare PRINCE2 Closing a Project material: product acceptance, end project report, lessons report, benefits review plan, handover, follow-on actions, and closure recommendation.

Transforms uploaded course materials into exam-oriented study notes, practice questions, and scoring-focused explanations.

Draft a detailed privacy policy covering data types, jurisdiction, GDPR and compliance considerations, and clauses needing legal review.

Creates editable PowerPoint decks with PptxGenJS, renders them to images for review, and checks for layout issues before delivery.

Python code style, linting, formatting, naming conventions, and documentation standards. Use when writing new code, reviewing style, configuring linters, writing docstrings, or establishing project standards.

Create, extract, or convert architectural decision records (ADRs) using a structured template, with project context discovery and evidence-based review.