Results for “user-flow”

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

Generate user-friendly "Explain Like I'm 5" feature documentation for end users by reading the codebase. Use this skill whenever the user wants to document a feature for non-technical users, write help docs, create an explainer for a feature in their app, produce onboarding content, or asks "make a user doc for X". Trigger on phrasings like "ELI5 the closeout flow", "write user docs for the kanban view", "explain this feature to a customer", "make a help article for X", "document this for end users". Also known as "E-features-LI5". This skill produces plain-language docs written for someone with the app open trying to get something done — not internal developer docs (use the `teach` skill for those) and not feature announcements.

Generates a structured developer-facing markdown document that teaches how a specific feature, module, or piece of functionality works in the codebase. Use this skill whenever the user runs `/teach`, asks "how does X work", "explain the auth flow", "document how payments work", "walk me through the webhook system", or any request to understand and document internal codebase functionality. Also trigger when the user wants to produce onboarding docs, feature walkthroughs, or "how it works" references for developers. Always use this skill even if the user only gives a vague description — use the provided context or file hints to locate the relevant code yourself and build the teaching doc from there. This skill writes for developers reading the codebase — for end-user/customer-facing help docs, use the eli5-features skill instead.

Use this skill whenever a user wants to create a presentation outline, slide deck structure, storyboard slides, or plan a deck for any context (talk, boardroom, email report). Also use when the user mentions "help me structure my presentation", "slide outline", "storyboard my deck", "presentation flow", "plan my slides", "key message for my deck", "pyramid principle for slides", "what slides should I include", or "help me tell a story with slides". This skill walks through a complete, interactive process in two phases: Phase 1 (setup → key message → storyboard) saves a slide-outline.md; Phase 2 (interactive per-slide copy drafting → polish) saves a slide-copy.md that is linked from slide-outline.md. Trigger even when the user only mentions a vague intent like "I need to present X to my team" or "help me put together a board deck".

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.