Results for “attribution-analysis”

Systematically evaluates evidence to determine which threat actor is responsible for a cyber operation using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses.

When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear about us," "self-reported attribution," "dark social," or wants to instrument attribution themselves — "stitch my bookings to their source," "SavvyCal/Calendly attribution," "close the identify gap," "track conversions on a third-party domain," "first-party / self-hosted attribution." For event tracking setup and UTMs, see analytics. For ad-platform pixels/CAPI, see ads. For pipeline and CRM revenue reporting, see revops. For the AI-search attribution blind spot, see ai-seo.

Analyzes campaign performance with multi-touch attribution, funnel conversion analysis, and ROI calculation for marketing optimization.

Pick the attribution model that fits the question, then build it. First touch, last touch, or multi-touch, each with its blind spots named out loud, turned into an honest channel-contribution read. Built for B2B RevOps and marketing teams, customizable to your CRM and your channel taxonomy. Trigger on "build attribution", "which channels drive pipeline", "first vs last touch", "how should we credit marketing", "what's working in our funnel", or any attribution diagnostic.

UTM parameter strategy, campaign tracking, and marketing attribution modeling. Build consistent UTM taxonomies, configure attribution models, measure cross-channel performance, and connect marketing spend to revenue. Use when the user asks about UTM parameters, campaign tracking, attribution models, marketing measurement, or cross-channel analytics.

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For choosing attribution models, comparing multi-touch/MMM/incrementality, or reconciling conflicting numbers across tools, see attribution. For A/B test measurement, see ab-testing.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Generate comprehensive marketing analytics reports by collecting KPIs, analyzing trends, and delivering actionable insights with attribution modeling and funnel analysis. Use when the user requests analytics reporting or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Profiles 5 competitors, identifies white space, and delivers a positioning recommendation — not a feature comparison table. Use this skill — proactively and without waiting to be asked — whenever entering a new market, before defining bets in product strategy, when pricing needs a competitive anchor, or when losing deals to a specific competitor. Also triggers for: "competitive analysis", "competitor research", "who are my competitors", "market landscape", "white space", "differentiation angle", "competitive positioning", "market entry risk", "losing to X", "pricing strategy", "threat assessment", "who owns this segment", "competitive brief", "how do we differentiate", "what are competitors doing". Produces a decision-ready competitive map: 5 competitor profiles, white space analysis, and a Where-to-Win recommendation with explicit areas to ignore.

Use when positioning a manuscript against the existing economics literature, building the antecedents map for the introduction, deciding what to cite, or verifying that every reference in the bibliography is real, correctly attributed, and cited to the published version. Apply at topic selection for the novelty scan and again before drafting the introduction.