Results for “commissions”

Simulates a board of legendary marketing advisors to provide multiple expert perspectives on marketing questions, highlighting disagreements and synthesizing recommendations.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-facet Consensus positioning analysis (with draft Significance/Innovation language), maps the research to the right NIH institutes and study sections via RePORTER, finds NOSIs and funded overlap, and produces an editable Word document (.docx) with budget/scope-aware mechanism recommendations, submission timelines, and a mandatory program officer recommendation. Use when the user asks about research funding or makes any grant-related request (e.g., 'grants for [topic]', 'find grants for my research idea', 'what grants match my research', 'help me find NIH funding', 'grant opportunities for my research'). NIH-only scope — non-NIH funders (PCORI, DOD CDMRP, VA, foundations) are out of scope and flagged at intake.

Build a quarterly bookings forecast with commit, best-case, and pipe-only tiers, project cohort-level NRR/GRR to surface leaky cohorts, and score per-stage funnel confidence using coefficient-of-variation analysis.

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis based on Nielsen's 10 heuristics, Krug's laws, and severity ratings.

When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

Turn a piece of analysis into the thing that ships it. Takes the output of a read (an account verdict, a usage story, a ranked list) and drafts the CRM update, the Slack post, the follow-up email, and the next touch, draft-first and fully logged. Built for any GTM team, customizable to your CRM, your channel tool, and your outreach stack. Trigger on "draft the CRM update for this", "post this to a channel", "write a follow-up to this person", "update the qualification fields on this account", "send this recommendation to a teammate", "draft an outreach sequence", or any write, send, or notify step at the end of a workflow.

Operate the Teams meeting summary pipeline via Hermes CLI — summarize meetings, inspect pipeline status, replay jobs, manage Microsoft Graph subscriptions.

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "UX review", "users are confused", "heuristic evaluation", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "usability testing". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving form completion rates, or evaluating information architecture and navigation. Covers Nielsens 10 heuristics, severity ratings, and information architecture. For visual design fixes, see refactoring-ui. For conversion-focused audits, see cro-methodology.