Results for “should-assertions”

Simulates a board of legendary marketing advisors to provide multiple expert perspectives on marketing questions, highlighting disagreements and synthesizing recommendations.

Use when someone asks what is true, false, misleading, unsupported, unknown, or genuinely complicated in a persuasive message, article, pitch, advertisement, policy claim, or viral post. Analyze propaganda, spin, selective framing, urgency, social proof, deceptive marketing, and AI-generated persuasion by tracing claims to evidence and separating literal truth from implied conclusions. Do not use to read deception from demeanor, adjudicate intent, or replace broad domain research.

When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

Design and evaluate paid-ad experiments with hypotheses, randomization, sample-size calculations, guardrails, and decision rules for A/B and split tests.

Generate targeted value proposition statements for marketing, sales, and customer onboarding from existing value propositions.