Results for “argument-structure”

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

Structure spoken product-sense interview answers with assumptions, segmentation, pain-point prioritization, and MVP tradeoffs.

Provides a structured reasoning protocol for diagnosing complex relationships, organizations, institutions, public disputes, or long-term evolution using the CrossFrame framework, with explicit invocation required.

Stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions using structured critical reasoning across five modes: Socratic questioning, dialectic, pre-mortem, red teaming, and evidence audit.

Audits hidden assumptions in decisions or beliefs by classifying them into fact, convention, belief, or interest-driven, ranking by fragility and impact, then rebuilding conclusions from verified premises. Supports English and Chinese.

Designing, optimizing, and auditing repository structure: directory design, docs/ layout (PRD, specs, ADR), test/script organization, anti-pattern detection. Use for repo layout or migration planning.