Results for “planner”

Guides the agent to act as a product manager, collecting context, proposing three requirement plans (bug fix, new feature, iteration), scoring them by ROI, and recommending one with an MVP slice and timeline.

Compare, cross-review, and merge competing plans from multiple agents into one executable direction with a clear handoff.

Continues deep iteration on an existing planning document: detects explicit file-loading intent, provides status summaries, and supports on-demand in-depth exploration.

Reads a plan document, decomposes it into steps, designs a per-step agent chain from the ECC catalogue, and emits ready-to-paste /orchestrate custom prompts without executing them.

Routing-first visual approval gate for AI agent plans, markdown specs, and diffs. Use when a human needs to review a concrete plan before execution, inspect a targeted diff in a browser, mark up a spec/PRD/architecture note, or set up the review loop on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, or OpenCode. Route planning/spec creation to `task-planning` or `ralph`, broad PR-policy review to `code-review`, rendered-UI critique to `agentation`, and fresh-session browser verification to `browser-harness`.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "swap tokens", "trade ETH for USDC", "exchange tokens on Uniswap", "buy tokens", "sell tokens", "convert ETH to stablecoins", "find memecoins", "discover tokens", "research tokens", "tokens to buy", "find tokens to swap", "what should I buy", or mentions swapping, trading, researching, discovering, buying, or exchanging tokens on any Uniswap-supported chain. Supports both known token swaps and token discovery workflows (discovery uses keyword search and web search — there is no live "trending" feed). Generates deep links to execute swaps in the Uniswap interface.

Reviews a product document (PRD, spec, design brief) BEFORE implementation to surface holes — undefined edge cases, missing states, policy gaps — by attacking what the document is SILENT about (things unwritten, and things written only for the happy path). Acts as a strict "sign-off manager," ruling Approve / Conditional / Reject and producing a polite, forwardable question list. Works for planners/PMs (self-review before sharing), engineers (blocking questions before coding), and designers (screen states with no mockup). Use whenever the user wants a spec/PRD/plan/brief checked for readiness or gaps, or says "review this spec", "find holes in this PRD", "poke holes in this", "is this plan good to build?", "can I start implementing this?", "what states/edge cases am I missing?", "what should I ask the PM before coding?", "run devil", or pastes/links a planning document and asks whether it's ready to act on. Do NOT use it to: write or draft a new spec, summarize or translate a document, estimate/break down tic