Results for “pr-draft”

Drafts stipulated ESI protocols for federal e-discovery. Produces court-ready agreements governing preservation, collection, processing, review, and production of electronically stored information under FRCP Rules 26, 34, 37 and Sedona Principles. Trigger when formalizing ESI procedures between parties during the discovery phase.

Builds an investor, product, or sales pitch deck as a PPTX file from a written brief, extracting fundamentals, flagging gaps as TODOs, drafting slides with speaker notes, and rendering with python-pptx.

Builds a complete launch package for an app, tool, or library: product audit, positioning, landing copy, store listings, Product Hunt and Show HN drafts, a 14-post social calendar, SEO baseline fixes, and a launch-day runbook, all written to a launch/ directory.

prd-writer

Generate Product Requirements Documents through structured conversation for any project. Use when starting a new feature, documenting requirements, creating specs before implementation, or needing clarity on scope and success criteria.

Run a structured discovery interview and produce a complete, developer-ready Product Requirements Document. Load when the user asks to write a PRD, create product requirements, document a feature, define user stories with acceptance criteria, or turn a rough idea into a formal product requirements document. Also triggers on "document this feature", "write requirements for", "create a one-pager", "turn this into a PRD", "I need a PRD for", or any request to produce a structured product document for stakeholder alignment or engineering handoff. Supports Full PRD, Lean PRD, and One-Pager formats. Note: for executable feature specifications (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then consumable by AI coding agents), route to `feature-spec` instead — PRDs frame the product, feature-specs encode the implementable contract.

Extracts and reconciles medical provider, wage-loss, and insurance/lien data from personal injury plaintiff fact sheets and initial disclosures against builder draft responses. Use when the user mentions PFS analysis, medical provider reconciliation, wage loss audit, insurance lien tracking, PI discovery reconciliation, builder response validation, MDL plaintiff data extraction, FRCP 26(a)(1) disclosures, treatment chronologies, or specials spreadsheets.

Creates decision-focused PRDs and product specs — the kind that make explicit decisions, not document hopes. Make sure to use this skill whenever someone asks to write, review, draft, or improve any product document, including PRDs, feature specs, requirements docs, or product specifications. Trigger even when the user doesn't say "PRD" explicitly — phrases like "write a spec for X", "define requirements for Y", "what should my PRD include", "help me document this feature", or "my spec feels too vague" all apply. Do not attempt to write the PRD directly without consulting this skill. Produces 5-stage PRDs with behavior contracts (15-25 labeled examples for AI features), measurable success metrics with specific thresholds, precise rollout plans with percentages and ramp gates, and antipattern detection. Works for AI features, SaaS, mobile apps, and traditional software.

Plan a feature from BRD-lite brief or clear intent into PRD (What), decisions, implementation plan, and task slices.

Turns a raw idea, brain dump, or conversation into a complete PRD with mandatory acceptance criteria and measurable success metrics. Extracts the problem, target users, and jobs-to-be-done, runs a quick competitive scan (web if available, logged as a gap if not), drafts the full PRD (problem, personas, user stories.

Create OR review a page-brief — the artifact BETWEEN a wireflow and the full PRD. It turns each unique page/screen of a product into documented requirements TIED TO JOBS: a self-contained board card per page (what the page is accountable for, the job-tagged checklist of what it must let you do, the journeys it appears in, what it connects to, and the acceptance criteria that say how you'd know it's right). It is the "PRD per page", not a sitemap — and it stops ABOVE the screen: no components, no layout, no hierarchy. Use whenever the user wants to "spec the pages", "document each screen", turn a wireflow + live design into per-page requirements, or asks "what does this page need to do / which jobs pass through it" — even if they never say "page-brief". Natural NEXT STEP after the wireflow skill. ALSO use it to REVIEW an existing page-brief / screen catalog. In the A-Team pipeline this is a definition-phase skill: output lands in docs/features/<slug>/briefs/pages/, job codes are the durable [[NN]] ids from doc

Drafts and revises academic papers through a 12-agent pipeline with hardened LaTeX output (apa7 document class, justified text, table column-width formula, centered bilingual abstracts, standardized font stack, PDF compiled from LaTeX), supporting IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures, APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, and Vancouver citation formats, bilingual zh-TW plus EN abstracts, and multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Use when the request mentions write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, or 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖. Its citation-check mode formats and inserts citations while drafting; for a standalone anti-hallucination check that cited references actually exist prefer alterlab-citation-verifier instead. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Produces a plain-language stakeholder summary from an existing feature specification, for sharing with non-technical stakeholders before implementation kicks off. Use when the user wants to draft a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary of a feature spec or PRD. Does not write the spec itself — use plan-a-feature. Does not sequence the build into phases — use plan-a-phased-build. Does not produce an implementation plan — use plan-implementation.

Reviews a product document (PRD, spec, design brief) BEFORE implementation to surface holes — undefined edge cases, missing states, policy gaps — by attacking what the document is SILENT about (things unwritten, and things written only for the happy path). Acts as a strict "sign-off manager," ruling Approve / Conditional / Reject and producing a polite, forwardable question list. Works for planners/PMs (self-review before sharing), engineers (blocking questions before coding), and designers (screen states with no mockup). Use whenever the user wants a spec/PRD/plan/brief checked for readiness or gaps, or says "review this spec", "find holes in this PRD", "poke holes in this", "is this plan good to build?", "can I start implementing this?", "what states/edge cases am I missing?", "what should I ask the PM before coding?", "run devil", or pastes/links a planning document and asks whether it's ready to act on. Do NOT use it to: write or draft a new spec, summarize or translate a document, estimate/break down tic