Results for “spec”

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC with agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, and compliance guidance.

Classify medical devices under EU MDR 2017/745, build technical documentation, plan clinical evaluations, and manage post-market surveillance and EUDAMED integration.

Automates question submission to Amazon's Alexa/Rufus AI shopping assistant and collects structured response data, with optional keyword search context for category-specific answers.

Provides paragraph-level structural blueprints for writing systems papers targeting OSDI, SOSP, ASPLOS, NSDI, and EuroSys, including page allocation, writing patterns, and venue-specific checklists.

Diverga Dashboard - Live configuration status and feature overview. 24 specialized agents across 9 categories for social science research. VS methodology prevents mode collapse. Human checkpoints enforce human-in-the-loop decisions. Triggers: /diverga, diverga dashboard, diverga status

Generate concise (3-4 page) medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format across all clinical specialties, with SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, and HIPAA compliance.

Compile deep repository evidence into artifact-bound correctness doctrine, including authority/law/proof maps, owned invariants, failure archaeology, and knowledge routing, with an optional minimal repository-specific skill portfolio.

Query the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) for CRISPR gene dependency scores, drug sensitivity data, and gene effect profiles to identify cancer-specific vulnerabilities, synthetic lethal interactions, and validate oncology drug targets.

Get research-backed architecture advice for your knowledge system. Describe your use case, constraints, and goals — get specific recommendations grounded in TFT research with rationale for each decision. Triggers on "/recommend", "what would you recommend", "architecture advice", "knowledge system for".

Perplexity Sonar search and answer generation through AIsa. Use when the task is specifically to call Perplexity Sonar, Sonar Pro, Sonar Reasoning Pro, or Sonar Deep Research for citation-backed web answers, analytical reasoning, or long-form research reports.

Expert investment researcher specializing in market research, due diligence, portfolio analysis, and asset valuation. Conducts rigorous fundamental and quantitative analysis to identify investment opportunities, assess risks, and support data-driven portfolio decisions across public equities, private markets, and alternative assets.

Guided statistical analysis with test selection and reporting. Use when you need help choosing appropriate tests for your data, assumption checking, power analysis, and APA-formatted results. Best for academic research reporting, test selection guidance. For implementing specific models programmatically use statsmodels.

Query the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) for cancer cell line gene dependency scores, drug sensitivity data, and gene effect profiles to identify cancer-specific vulnerabilities, synthetic lethal interactions, and validate oncology drug targets.

Run customer interviews that uncover real problems using Mom Test rules: ask about their life, not your idea; focus on past specifics; and secure commitments instead of collecting compliments.

Query the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) for cancer cell line gene dependency scores (CRISPR Chronos), drug sensitivity data, and gene effect profiles. Use for identifying cancer-specific vulnerabilities, synthetic lethal interactions, and validating oncology drug targets.

Runs a full website SEO audit by crawling up to 500 pages, detecting business type, delegating to specialist subagents, and producing a prioritized action plan with a health score.

Use when a research design spec exists and the user is ready to translate it into a concrete implementation plan with phased tasks, artifacts, and verification criteria. Produces a research execution plan organized in canonical research phases — collection, preparation, analysis, robustness, writing, submission.

Builds reusable specialized skills for creating research-paper figures from lawful source material, then uses those skills to design and render figures for target papers.

Use when auditing a KDD submission for readiness in either cycle, covering Research vs ADS track declaration, OpenReview profile completeness for all authors, the ACM sigconf 8-content-page budget, double-blind checks, in-paper artifact references, resubmission declarations, and desk-reject triggers specific to ACM SIGKDD.

Run structured What-If scenario analysis with 4-6 branch possibility exploration (best, likely, worst, wild card, contrarian, second-order). Use for speculative questions about uncertain futures, strategic forks, contingency planning, or stress-testing decisions.

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

规划、撰写、重构、润色、压缩、扩写、收口和审校中文医学文本，并为持续项目建立写作主控索引、内容型总纲、全文一致性账本、章节任务书、证据账本、决策记录和最终交付物清单。支持 Grant（医学基金标书、项目申请、研究目标、任务分解、技术路线、进度与甘特图、项目管理、风险分析、创新性、预期效益、研究基础和可行性论证）与 Journal（毕业论文、期刊论文、综述、病例报告、指南解读和学术报告），自动识别或联合调用全文建构、局部构篇、语言精修、结构审计、语言审计及项目收口。

Produces a decision-grade dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org by testing the user's hypothesis rather than confirming it. Outputs an editable Word document with verdict, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network and reputation signals, and red flags.

Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".

Gmail Lead Desk — standalone sales/CS Gmail skill via the AISA gateway: OAuth connect, scan unread leads, summarize threads, draft template replies (default draft-only), archive with labels. Keywords: Gmail Lead Desk, Gmail, lead desk, sales, customer support, follow-up, unread, inquiry summary, draft reply, archive, OAuth, AISA, connected account, thread_id. Use when: the user needs this workflow's domain-specific automation or guidance.

Live Upwork market research producing a ranked niche-opportunity dashboard. Use when the user wants to scan the Upwork market, find or validate a freelance niche, asks 'is there demand for X', wants competitor profile analysis, or needs rate observations for a niche. Triggers: 'research my niche', 'scan the Upwork market', 'is there demand', 'what should I specialize in', 'check the market', 'what do freelancers charge for X'.

Requires AISA_API_KEY. Uses the supplied AISA_API_KEY to send requests to https://api.aisa.one. Native-first ClawHub plugin for `gmail-lead-desk`. Ships the packaged AIsa skill with an `openclaw.plugin.json` manifest and a Claude-compatible bundle fallback. Gmail Lead Desk — standalone sales/CS Gmail skill via the AISA gateway: OAuth connect, scan unread leads, summarize threads, draft template replies (default draft-only), archive with labels. Keywords: Gmail Lead Desk, Gmail, lead desk, sales, customer support, follow-up, unread, inquiry summary, draft reply, archive, OAuth, AISA, connected account, thread_id. Use when: the user needs this workflow's domain-specific automation or guidance.

STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.

When the user wants to find, qualify, and build a list of prospects to reach out to — across B2B SaaS, general B2B, or local small businesses. Also use when the user mentions "prospecting," "build a prospect list," "find prospects," "find leads," "lead gen list," "find SaaS companies that," "find B2B companies," "find local businesses," "ICP-fit accounts," "who should we go after," "outbound list," "target account list," "find clients near me," "businesses without websites," "prospect research," "qualified leads," "find my first customers," "early adopters," "design partners," "beta users," or "who has this problem." Use this for the list-building and qualification phase. For writing the outbound copy after the list is built, see cold-email. For deep competitive research on specific accounts, see competitor-profiling.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with acade