Results for “accusation-audit”

Verifies every bibliographic entry in a paper for existence, metadata accuracy, and contextual support using web/DBLP/arXiv lookups, flagging hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, and misattributed citations.

Audits hidden assumptions in decisions or beliefs by classifying them into fact, convention, belief, or interest-driven, ranking by fragility and impact, then rebuilding conclusions from verified premises. Supports English and Chinese.

Verifies that every number, comparison, and scope claim in a research paper matches raw result files, using a fresh cross-model reviewer with no prior context to prevent confirmation bias.