Results for “assessment”

Analyze AI disruption pressure across a business, map competitive exposure, and produce a 90-day defensive action plan.

Analyze political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal forces to identify external opportunities and threats for strategic planning.

Track weekly funding rounds across configurable verticals with primary-source verification, per-round analysis, and risk assessment.

Identify what to measure, test, or track to de-risk a product or AI idea across internal and external risk dimensions.

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals with structured, checklist-based peer review covering methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards.

Estimate market size using TAM, SAM, and SOM with top-down and bottom-up approaches for market opportunity assessment, investor pitches, or market entry evaluation.

Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped, evaluate maturity across five key competencies, and get recommendations on which capability to build next.

VS-Enhanced Qualitative Design Consultant with Ethnography & Action Research Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids overused phenomenology, proposes context-optimal qualitative strategies Absorbed H1 (Ethnographic Research Advisor) and H2 (Action Research Facilitator) capabilities Use when: selecting qualitative research design, planning phenomenology/grounded theory/case study/ethnography/action research Triggers: phenomenology, 현상학, grounded theory, 근거이론, case study, 사례연구, narrative inquiry, ethnography, 민족지, action research, 실행연구, qualitative design

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

Evaluates US market bubble risk through quantitative data analysis using the Minsky/Kindleberger framework, scoring indicators like Put/Call ratio, VIX, margin debt, breadth, and IPO data.

Structure the first 90 days of a VP or CPO transition as a diagnostic process, not an execution sprint, using a three-phase playbook to build evidence before making decisions.

Run structured What-If scenario analysis with 4-6 branch possibility exploration (best, likely, worst, wild card, contrarian, second-order). Use for speculative questions about uncertain futures, strategic forks, contingency planning, or stress-testing decisions.

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for health data processing under GDPR Article 9, HIPAA, and sector-specific health privacy regulations. Covers special category data safeguards, clinical research data, patient portals, health wearables, genetic data, and cross-border health data transfers. Keywords: health data PIA, DPIA, Article 9, HIPAA, special category data, clinical research, patient privacy, genetic data.

Comprehensive biosignal processing toolkit for analyzing physiological data including ECG, EEG, EDA, RSP, PPG, EMG, and EOG signals. Use this skill when processing cardiovascular signals, brain activity, electrodermal responses, respiratory patterns, muscle activity, or eye movements. Applicable for heart rate variability analysis, event-related potentials, complexity measures, autonomic nervous system assessment, psychophysiology research, and multi-modal physiological signal integration.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with acade