Results for “bias-check”

8 skills

brycewang-stanford

Research Guardian - Ethics Advisory & Bias Detection across all research stages Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Surface-level screening, deep contextual analysis, constructive recommendations Use when: reviewing research ethics, checking for bias, assessing trustworthiness, QRP screening Triggers: ethics review, IRB, bias detection, QRP, trustworthiness, research integrity, p-hacking, HARKing

More results

Benchmarks LLM bias by scoring responses to automatically generated open-ended questions across sensitive attributes, producing a composite fitness score from 0 to 5.

Verifies claims, articles, screenshots, and URLs through source-grounded analysis with an evidence ledger, source credibility evaluation, and manipulation detection. Supports quick checks, full fact-check cards, two-source comparisons, and prebunking in multiple languages and policy contexts.

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

statistical-analysis

Guides statistical hypothesis testing with assumption checks, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting for research data.

30.2k · bundle

paper-claim-audit

Verifies that every number, comparison, and scope claim in a research paper matches raw result files, using a fresh cross-model reviewer with no prior context to prevent confirmation bias.

source-checker-verify-a-claim-and-rate-the-evidence

Verifies a claim by finding primary sources and rates the evidence as supported, mixed, unsupported, or unverifiable, with citations and what would change the verdict.

brycewang-stanford

check-citations

Verify academic citations against CrossRef, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex. Detects AI-hallucinated references, chimeric citations, and suspicious patterns.