Results for “credibility-scoring”

Verifies a claim by finding primary sources and rates the evidence as supported, mixed, unsupported, or unverifiable, with citations and what would change the verdict.

Verifies claims, articles, screenshots, and URLs through source-grounded analysis with an evidence ledger, source credibility evaluation, and manipulation detection. Supports quick checks, full fact-check cards, two-source comparisons, and prebunking in multiple languages and policy contexts.

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Produces a decision-grade dossier on a specific company, person, nonprofit, or government org by testing the user's hypothesis rather than confirming it. Outputs an editable Word document with verdict, identity facts, 12-month activity timeline, network and reputation signals, and red flags.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Scores competitors across nine weighted dimensions with explicit 1–5 rubrics and a tension plot, producing comparable profile cards for competitive analysis.

Verify academic citations against CrossRef, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex. Detects AI-hallucinated references, chimeric citations, and suspicious patterns.