Results for “fact-forcing”

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

Verifies claims, articles, screenshots, and URLs through source-grounded analysis with an evidence ledger, source credibility evaluation, and manipulation detection. Supports quick checks, full fact-check cards, two-source comparisons, and prebunking in multiple languages and policy contexts.

Enforces anti-hallucination constraints including citation requirements, source grounding, and explicit 'I don't know' responses for research tasks.

Verify the article’s factual, product, citation, and link integrity before visual production.

Forces web searches and reading of official docs before implementing, integrating, or debugging third-party APIs, libraries, and services to ensure accuracy and avoid guesswork.

Answers factual questions by searching the web, fetching primary sources, and cross-checking claims before citing them.

Evidence-first current-state research workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants fresh facts, comparisons, enrichment, or a recommendation built from current public evidence and any supplied local context.

Use when incorporating information from research, references, or external sources. This skill provides verification procedures to ensure information used in deliverables is accurate, current, and from authoritative sources, preventing hallucination and misinformation.

以证据为先的ECC当前状态研究工作流程。当用户希望基于当前公开证据和提供的本地上下文获取最新事实、比较、丰富信息或建议时使用。

Orchestrates evidence-based research across local PDFs, scholarly search, citation-context tools, web sources, and code repositories to produce traceable syntheses with counterevidence audits.