Results for “research-presentation”

Generate academic research proposals for PhD applications. Use when user asks to "write a research proposal", "create PhD proposal", "generate research plan", "撰写研究计划", "写博士申请", "doctoral proposal", or mentions specific research topics for PhD application. Supports STEM, humanities, and social sciences with field-specific adaptations. Follows Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions. Supports both English and Chinese output based on user preference.

Search Notion pages, synthesize findings, and publish structured briefs, summaries, comparisons, or reports with citations and source links.

Organize research by managing references, notes, and collaboration across Google Drive, Docs, Sheets, and Gmail.

Search and fetch Notion pages, synthesize findings, and publish structured briefs, summaries, comparisons, or reports with citations and source links.

Draft an internal legal research memo for the supervising attorney with verified authority and flagged open questions.

Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.

用于国自然、国社科等基金申请、开题报告、博士后/人才计划、研究计划书等学术提案的撰写、审查和优化；当用户需要基于已有研究成果形成立项书、区分事实与 AI 建议、检查任务书一致性、补强论证逻辑时使用。

research-synthesis

Generate and rank research ideas given a broad direction. Use when user says "找idea", "brainstorm ideas", "generate research ideas", "what can we work on", or wants to explore a research area for publishable directions.

帮助用户撰写高质量的文献综述类论文。提供从选题、文献检索、评估筛选、结构规划到最终写作的全流程指导。适用于需要撰写独立文献综述论文或学术论文中文献综述部分的用户。

端到端研究编排器：idea 发现 → 实验设计 → 执行 → 判决 → 论文撰写，带人工门控和状态恢复

Route research prompts to evidence, retrieval, scraping, data, market, or scientific research skills. Use when prompts mention deep research, current facts, citations, Exa, iterative retrieval, search-first, scraping, data pipelines, PubMed, USPTO, gget, literature review, or scholar evaluation.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-face...

以证据为先的ECC当前状态研究工作流程。当用户希望基于当前公开证据和提供的本地上下文获取最新事实、比较、丰富信息或建议时使用。

Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

Conduct multi-pass web and academic research, cross-check claims, and produce a cited report saved to file and memory.

Look up current research and scientific information across three backends: fast web search, deep multi-source synthesis, and scholarly paper searches. Automatically routes each query to the best backend and saves every result for reproducible citation.

Evidence-first current-state research workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants fresh facts, comparisons, enrichment, or a recommendation built from current public evidence and any supplied local context.

Researches VC funds and partners, providing thesis matching, portfolio analysis, and approach strategy for outreach.

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

Runs evidence-first research workflows, choosing the lightest useful path from search to deep synthesis, and labels facts, inference, and recommendations.

Runs evidence-first current-state research, comparing options and enriching people or companies, then reports with explicit evidence boundaries.

Skeptical pushback on the research dossier before it feeds the outline. Asks whether claims are cited, whether surprising findings are actually surprising, whether we missed the strongest competitor angle. One revision pass on FAIL (BLOG_AGENT_RESEARCH_REVISION_BUDGET, default 1).

Orchestrates evidence-based research across local PDFs, scholarly search, citation-context tools, web sources, and code repositories to produce traceable syntheses with counterevidence audits.

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea