Results for “research-provenance”

Query documented public database APIs with explicit endpoints, filters, pagination, and provenance for reproducible retrieval of scientific, regulatory, or financial facts.

Evidence-first current-state research workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants fresh facts, comparisons, enrichment, or a recommendation built from current public evidence and any supplied local context.

research-synthesis

Runs evidence-first current-state research, comparing options and enriching people or companies, then reports with explicit evidence boundaries.

Generate academic research proposals for PhD applications. Use when user asks to "write a research proposal", "create PhD proposal", "generate research plan", "撰写研究计划", "写博士申请", "doctoral proposal", or mentions specific research topics for PhD application. Supports STEM, humanities, and social sciences with field-specific adaptations. Follows Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions. Supports both English and Chinese output based on user preference.

Route research prompts to evidence, retrieval, scraping, data, market, or scientific research skills. Use when prompts mention deep research, current facts, citations, Exa, iterative retrieval, search-first, scraping, data pipelines, PubMed, USPTO, gget, literature review, or scholar evaluation.

Orchestrates evidence-based research across local PDFs, scholarly search, citation-context tools, web sources, and code repositories to produce traceable syntheses with counterevidence audits.

Produces decision-oriented market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution.

Runs evidence-first research workflows, choosing the lightest useful path from search to deep synthesis, and labels facts, inference, and recommendations.

Runs evidence-first research workflows by combining search, synthesis, and recommendation skills for current facts, comparisons, or enrichment.

Routes UI evidence, comparisons, critiques, references, best practices, and design research to one research workflow.

Plan and synthesize product/user research with method rigor: select the right method for the goal, compute defensible sample sizes with confidence labels, and cluster coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes.

Philosophy of science methodology examining how research programs evolve through proofs and refutations

Verify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.

用于国自然、国社科等基金申请、开题报告、博士后/人才计划、研究计划书等学术提案的撰写、审查和优化；当用户需要基于已有研究成果形成立项书、区分事实与 AI 建议、检查任务书一致性、补强论证逻辑时使用。

Stateful validator-gated research loop with native-hook persistence

Researches and recommends programming technologies, libraries, and architectural approaches with verified references from official documentation.

Higher-precedence research helper with risky setup.

Verify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Guide product managers through a complete discovery cycle from problem hypothesis to validated solution using problem framing, customer interviews, synthesis, and experimentation.

Rigorous market researcher for Prodig Suites. Use for competitor analysis, demand signal analysis, gap identification, market intelligence. Triggers: 'market research', 'competitor analysis', 'demand validation', 'market gaps', 'opportunity research', 'competitive landscape'.

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-face...

以证据为先的ECC当前状态研究工作流程。当用户希望基于当前公开证据和提供的本地上下文获取最新事实、比较、丰富信息或建议时使用。

Conduct multi-pass web and academic research, cross-check claims, and produce a cited report saved to file and memory.

Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

Skeptical pushback on the research dossier before it feeds the outline. Asks whether claims are cited, whether surprising findings are actually surprising, whether we missed the strongest competitor angle. One revision pass on FAIL (BLOG_AGENT_RESEARCH_REVISION_BUDGET, default 1).

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

Verify the article’s factual, product, citation, and link integrity before visual production.

Traces design decisions and concepts through session history, handoffs, git, and artifacts, producing a chronological timeline report with citations.