Results for “scholarly-impact”

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

Generate novel research ideas through structured, conversational brainstorming that explores interdisciplinary connections, challenges assumptions, and identifies research gaps.

Runs Stanford's STORM pipeline to produce Wikipedia-quality research articles with citations, using Claude models and a search engine API.

Chrome-dependent academic literature scouting and idea planning. Use when the user gives a research idea, topic, question, or draft direction and wants Codex to browse Google, Google Scholar, and academic sources through the Codex Chrome plugin, identify relevant papers, explain what can be borrowed from them, and write a planNN.md before collecting PDFs or BibTeX.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Guides researchers through structured ideation frameworks to discover high-impact research directions.

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

帮助用户撰写高质量的文献综述类论文。提供从选题、文献检索、评估筛选、结构规划到最终写作的全流程指导。适用于需要撰写独立文献综述论文或学术论文中文献综述部分的用户。

Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles.

Generate academic research proposals for PhD applications. Use when user asks to "write a research proposal", "create PhD proposal", "generate research plan", "撰写研究计划", "写博士申请", "doctoral proposal", or mentions specific research topics for PhD application. Supports STEM, humanities, and social sciences with field-specific adaptations. Follows Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions. Supports both English and Chinese output based on user preference.

Search published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.) via Semantic Scholar API. Complements /arxiv (preprints) with citation counts, venue metadata, and TLDR. Use when user says "search semantic scholar", "find IEEE papers", "find journal papers", "venue papers", "citation search", or wants published literature beyond arXiv preprints.

Discovers and uses scientific datasets, models, blog posts, and interactive demos from a curated catalog for AI/ML work in domains like biology, chemistry, physics, and genomics.

从 wiki 知识生成论文 Related Work 章节：主题分组 → 叙事结构 → LaTeX 输出，遵循 citation-verification 和 academic-writing

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with acade

Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex API across 240M+ works, retrieving papers, authors, institutions, citations, and open access status. Use when searching academic papers, tracking citations, finding works by author or institution, analyzing research trends, discovering open access publications, or running bibliometric analysis. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

AI 论文速读 Skill：三档深度（裸读 / 引导 / 精读）+ 页码级 Provenance 防幻觉 + 多篇对比。 触发词：论文速读、读这篇论文、抓核心观点、论文对比、多篇对比、与我研究方向的关联、 第几页提到 X、这篇论文的数据集怎么构造的、论文精读、 paper summary、summarize this paper、compare these papers、literature skim、extract methodology。 不做：论文检索、文献管理、论文翻译、扫描件 OCR、论文写作 / 降重。

Verify academic citations against CrossRef, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex. Detects AI-hallucinated references, chimeric citations, and suspicious patterns.

Skeptical pushback on the research dossier before it feeds the outline. Asks whether claims are cited, whether surprising findings are actually surprising, whether we missed the strongest competitor angle. One revision pass on FAIL (BLOG_AGENT_RESEARCH_REVISION_BUDGET, default 1).

NIH grant research skill for clinical researchers. Grill-me intake (research idea + career stage + preliminary data + environment + submission posture + known institute targets) locks down the funding strategy before any search runs. Runs a 5-face...

Orchestrates evidence-based research across local PDFs, scholarly search, citation-context tools, web sources, and code repositories to produce traceable syntheses with counterevidence audits.

Literature survey and SOTA tracking specialist. Use when the user asks to talk to Sova, requests the research tracker, or needs literature review, citation mapping, and paper analysis.